Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-415 Exam - Topic 1 Question 115 Discussion

A network administrator is configuring a centralized control policy based on match action pairs for multiple conditions, which order must be configured to prefer Prefix List over TLOC and TLOC over Origin?
D) lowest to highest sequence number
A) highest to lowest sequence number
B) nonsequential order
C) deterministic order

Cisco 300-415 Exam - Topic 1 Question 115 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-415 exam
Question #: 115
Topic #: 1
[All 300-415 Questions]

A network administrator is configuring a centralized control policy based on match action pairs for multiple conditions, which order must be configured to prefer Prefix List over TLOC and TLOC over Origin?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D


by Johnetta at Nov 24, 2025, 06:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-415 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Beula
5 months ago
I’m with C) deterministic order. It ensures clarity in policy application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
5 months ago
I feel A) is the best choice. Consistency in sequence helps avoid confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
5 months ago
A) highest to lowest seems right. Clear hierarchy is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
5 months ago
I’m leaning towards C) deterministic order. It feels more logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
5 months ago
I think it’s A) highest to lowest sequence number. Makes sense for prioritization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
6 months ago
Nah, it’s definitely not B) nonsequential order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
6 months ago
I thought it was C) deterministic order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
7 months ago
I bet the network admin who came up with this question has a twisted sense of humor. Probably laughing at us all right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malika
7 months ago
Prefix List over TLOC over Origin? Sounds like a game of rock-paper-scissors to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
7 months ago
B. Nonsequential order? What kind of madness is that? I want my network admin to have a clear, logical plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
7 months ago
D. Lowest to highest sequence number seems counterintuitive to me. Why would you want the least important conditions to take precedence?
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
7 months ago
C. Deterministic order sounds like the way to go. It's important to have a consistent and predictable configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
7 months ago
I believe it’s about prioritizing the conditions, so it might be highest to lowest sequence number, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about deterministic order versus sequence numbers. I need to double-check my notes on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
8 months ago
This question feels familiar; I practiced a similar one where the order was crucial for policy application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm going to carefully consider each option and try to reason through the implications of the different ordering approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
8 months ago
I've seen questions like this before. I believe the correct answer is C) deterministic order, since that would ensure a consistent, predictable order of precedence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
8 months ago
Okay, I think I understand the key here. We need to configure the order to prefer Prefix List over TLOC and TLOC over Origin. Let me think through the options...
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
8 months ago
I agree, that makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
9 months ago
I think I remember something about sequence numbers, but I'm not sure if it's highest to lowest or lowest to highest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
9 months ago
It's definitely A) highest to lowest sequence number.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
9 months ago
I think the answer is A. Highest to lowest sequence number makes the most sense for prioritizing the match action pairs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
9 months ago
I disagree, I think B) nonsequential order could work too. Flexibility is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with centralized control policies and match action pairs. I'll need to review my networking concepts to tackle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
10 months ago
This looks like a networking configuration question. I'll need to think through the different match action pairs and their order of precedence.
upvoted 0 times
Maile
4 months ago
I agree, sequence number is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
4 months ago
Nah, it’s all about the sequence!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenora
4 months ago
But what about deterministic order?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
4 months ago
Definitely! Highest to lowest makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
5 months ago
I think it’s about the sequence number.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel