MENU
A network administrator is configuring a centralized control policy based on match action pairs for multiple conditions, which order must be configured to prefer Prefix List over TLOC and TLOC over Origin?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 300-415 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
BE
Beula
6 months ago
I’m with C) deterministic order. It ensures clarity in policy application.
LO
Lorrine
6 months ago
I feel A) is the best choice. Consistency in sequence helps avoid confusion.
KA
Kallie
7 months ago
A) highest to lowest seems right. Clear hierarchy is crucial.
DO
Domitila
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards C) deterministic order. It feels more logical.
MI
Mireya
7 months ago
I think it’s A) highest to lowest sequence number. Makes sense for prioritization.
BR
Brice
7 months ago
Nah, it’s definitely not B) nonsequential order.
RA
Rana
7 months ago
I thought it was C) deterministic order.
CH
Christoper
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off.
AN
An
8 months ago
I bet the network admin who came up with this question has a twisted sense of humor. Probably laughing at us all right now.
MA
Malika
8 months ago
Prefix List over TLOC over Origin? Sounds like a game of rock-paper-scissors to me!
WI
Willard
8 months ago
B. Nonsequential order? What kind of madness is that? I want my network admin to have a clear, logical plan.
DO
Dottie
9 months ago
D. Lowest to highest sequence number seems counterintuitive to me. Why would you want the least important conditions to take precedence?
SA
Samira
9 months ago
C. Deterministic order sounds like the way to go. It's important to have a consistent and predictable configuration.
BU
Burma
9 months ago
I believe it’s about prioritizing the conditions, so it might be highest to lowest sequence number, but I could be wrong.
AL
Alecia
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused about deterministic order versus sequence numbers. I need to double-check my notes on that.
KI
Kimi
9 months ago
This question feels familiar; I practiced a similar one where the order was crucial for policy application.
LE
Lettie
9 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm going to carefully consider each option and try to reason through the implications of the different ordering approaches.
MI
Mirta
10 months ago
I've seen questions like this before. I believe the correct answer is C) deterministic order, since that would ensure a consistent, predictable order of precedence.
SH
Shawna
10 months ago
Okay, I think I understand the key here. We need to configure the order to prefer Prefix List over TLOC and TLOC over Origin. Let me think through the options...
RO
Rolande
10 months ago
I agree, that makes the most sense!
ER
Erick
10 months ago
I think I remember something about sequence numbers, but I'm not sure if it's highest to lowest or lowest to highest.
RA
Rashida
10 months ago
It's definitely A) highest to lowest sequence number.
PA
Paulina
11 months ago
I think the answer is A. Highest to lowest sequence number makes the most sense for prioritizing the match action pairs.
MA
Maryann
11 months ago
I disagree, I think B) nonsequential order could work too. Flexibility is key.
MA
Marilynn
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with centralized control policies and match action pairs. I'll need to review my networking concepts to tackle this one.
AN
Annamae
11 months ago
This looks like a networking configuration question. I'll need to think through the different match action pairs and their order of precedence.
MA
Maile
5 months ago
I agree, sequence number is key here.
BE
Benedict
6 months ago
Nah, it’s all about the sequence!
EL
Elenora
6 months ago
But what about deterministic order?
ST
Stephania
6 months ago
Definitely! Highest to lowest makes sense.
AL
Albina
6 months ago
I think it’s about the sequence number.