Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 200-301 Exam - Topic 4 Question 108 Discussion

Which two WAN architecture options help a business improve scalability and reliability for the network? (Choose two.)
A) asynchronous routing and C) dual-homed branches
B) single-homed branches
D) static routing
E) dynamic routing

Cisco 200-301 Exam - Topic 4 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 200-301 exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 4
[All 200-301 Questions]

Which two WAN architecture options help a business improve scalability and reliability for the network? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Rickie at May 05, 2025, 05:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 200-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kallie
8 months ago
Surprised to see static routing mentioned at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
9 months ago
Asynchronous routing isn't a common choice for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
9 months ago
Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
9 months ago
Totally agree, those options really boost reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
9 months ago
Wait, are single-homed branches really that bad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
9 months ago
I feel like asynchronous routing might not be the best fit here. I lean towards dual-homed branches and dynamic routing for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused; I thought single-homed branches were simpler but maybe not as reliable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
10 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think dynamic routing could be a good choice for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
10 months ago
I think dual-homed branches are definitely one of the options since they provide redundancy. Not sure about the second one though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I remember discussing WAN architectures in class. I'll go with dual-homed branches and dynamic routing - those seem like the best choices to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
11 months ago
I'm not totally confident on this, but I think the key is looking for redundancy and flexibility in the WAN design. I'll give dual-homed branches and dynamic routing a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the two options that will help improve scalability and reliability for the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know WAN architectures can get pretty complex, so I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
11 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward WAN architecture question. I'll focus on the keywords "scalability" and "reliability" to guide my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
1 year ago
C and E, all the way. Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the real MVPs when it comes to improving scalability and reliability. Anything else is just a distraction, like trying to do a crossword puzzle with a broken pencil.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
1 year ago
Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing, baby! That's the dynamic duo for network success. Just like Batman and Robin, except with less capes and more routers.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
1 year ago
Exactly, it's all about redundancy and flexibility to ensure smooth operations for the business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 year ago
It's like having a backup plan for your backup plan, you can never be too prepared when it comes to network architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 year ago
I agree, having multiple connections at each branch and using dynamic routing protocols really helps with network performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
1 year ago
Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are definitely the way to go for scalability and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyssa
1 year ago
I'm torn between C and D. Static routing seems so... static, you know? Gotta go with the dual-homed branches and dynamic routing for that sweet, sweet scalability.
upvoted 0 times
Amber
1 year ago
Dual-homed branches offer that extra layer of reliability that can really benefit a business network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
1 year ago
Static routing can be limiting, so I think choosing dynamic routing is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
I agree, dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the way to go for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isidra
1 year ago
I prefer static routing over dynamic routing for better control of network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
1 year ago
I agree with Nobuko, dual-homed branches provide redundancy and dynamic routing adapts to network changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
I think dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
1 year ago
C and E, dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the way to go for scalability and reliability. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
Mollie
1 year ago
Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing provide the flexibility and redundancy needed for a reliable network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
1 year ago
Asynchronous routing and static routing are not as effective as dual-homed branches and dynamic routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
1 year ago
I agree, dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are essential for scalability and reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel