Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 200-301 Exam - Topic 4 Question 108 Discussion

Posted by Rickie on May 05, 2025 at 05:34 AM

Which two WAN architecture options help a business improve scalability and reliability for the network? (Choose two.)

Suggested Answer: A, C

Get Premium 200-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
KA
Kallie 10 months ago
Surprised to see static routing mentioned at all!
MA
Mariko 10 months ago
Asynchronous routing isn't a common choice for scalability.
GI
Gianna 10 months ago
Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the way to go!
WI
Wilford 11 months ago
Totally agree, those options really boost reliability.
AL
Alona 11 months ago
Wait, are single-homed branches really that bad?
AL
Alysa 11 months ago
I feel like asynchronous routing might not be the best fit here. I lean towards dual-homed branches and dynamic routing for sure.
TA
Tamekia 11 months ago
I'm a bit confused; I thought single-homed branches were simpler but maybe not as reliable?
LE
Letha 11 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think dynamic routing could be a good choice for scalability.
MU
Murray 12 months ago
I think dual-homed branches are definitely one of the options since they provide redundancy. Not sure about the second one though.
ST
Stephaine 12 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I remember discussing WAN architectures in class. I'll go with dual-homed branches and dynamic routing - those seem like the best choices to meet the requirements.
DA
Daisy 1 year ago
I'm not totally confident on this, but I think the key is looking for redundancy and flexibility in the WAN design. I'll give dual-homed branches and dynamic routing a try.
LY
Lyndia 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the two options that will help improve scalability and reliability for the network.
XO
Xochitl 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know WAN architectures can get pretty complex, so I'll need to think through the options carefully.
CH
Chau 1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward WAN architecture question. I'll focus on the keywords "scalability" and "reliability" to guide my answer.
VI
Vince 1 year ago
C and E, all the way. Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the real MVPs when it comes to improving scalability and reliability. Anything else is just a distraction, like trying to do a crossword puzzle with a broken pencil.
CA
Cassie 1 year ago
Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing, baby! That's the dynamic duo for network success. Just like Batman and Robin, except with less capes and more routers.
MA
Malcom 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cassie
Exactly, it's all about redundancy and flexibility to ensure smooth operations for the business.
MA
Malinda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cassie
It's like having a backup plan for your backup plan, you can never be too prepared when it comes to network architecture.
MA
Margurite 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cassie
I agree, having multiple connections at each branch and using dynamic routing protocols really helps with network performance.
CY
Cyril 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cassie
Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are definitely the way to go for scalability and reliability.
AL
Alyssa 1 year ago
I'm torn between C and D. Static routing seems so... static, you know? Gotta go with the dual-homed branches and dynamic routing for that sweet, sweet scalability.
AM
Amber 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
Dual-homed branches offer that extra layer of reliability that can really benefit a business network.
AM
Amie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
Static routing can be limiting, so I think choosing dynamic routing is a smart move.
JA
Jacquelyne 1 year ago
↳ replying to Alyssa
I agree, dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the way to go for scalability.
IS
Isidra 1 year ago
I prefer static routing over dynamic routing for better control of network traffic.
LI
Linn 1 year ago
I agree with Nobuko, dual-homed branches provide redundancy and dynamic routing adapts to network changes.
NO
Nobuko 1 year ago
I think dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the best options.
FL
Floyd 1 year ago
C and E, dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are the way to go for scalability and reliability. Easy peasy!
MO
Mollie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Floyd
Dual-homed branches and dynamic routing provide the flexibility and redundancy needed for a reliable network.
ER
Erin 1 year ago
↳ replying to Floyd
Asynchronous routing and static routing are not as effective as dual-homed branches and dynamic routing.
ME
Melynda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Floyd
I agree, dual-homed branches and dynamic routing are essential for scalability and reliability.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel