Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 200-301 Exam - Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.
B) Switch(config)#interface vlan 10Switch(config-if)#ip address 192.168.0.1 255 255.255.248
A) Switch(config)#interface vlan 10Switch(config-if)#ip address 192.168.0.1 265 255.255.252
C) Switch(config)#interface vlan 10Switch(config-if)#ip address 192.168.0.1 255 255.255.0
D) Switch(config)#interface vlan 10Switch(config-if)#ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.128

Cisco 200-301 Exam - Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 200-301 exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 2
[All 200-301 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Mattie
8 months ago
Wait, isn't 265 an invalid subnet mask?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
8 months ago
No way, D is definitely the correct answer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
9 months ago
I think C is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
9 months ago
Option B has the right subnet mask for a /22 network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
9 months ago
I'm not sure about this, can someone explain the differences?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the subnet mask was crucial. I think 255.255.255.0 is a common choice, but I’m not confident it fits here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
10 months ago
I definitely recall that the subnet mask needs to match the network size, but I can't remember if 255.255.255.128 is too large for a /24 network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
10 months ago
I think option B looks familiar, but I feel like I might have mixed up the subnet mask with another question we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
10 months ago
I remember studying VLAN configurations, but I'm not sure about the subnet masks. Was it 255.255.255.248 or something else?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
10 months ago
No problem, I've got this. The subnet mask is straightforward once you understand the IP addressing concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review my subnet masking knowledge before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
11 months ago
I've seen questions like this before. I think I know the right subnet mask, but I'll double-check my work to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. I need to figure out the subnet mask that matches the given IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky subnet question. I'll need to carefully calculate the subnet mask to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
11 months ago
I'm going with Option A. Who needs a proper subnet mask when you can just throw in some random numbers and hope for the best? That's the Cisco way, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
11 months ago
Come on, guys, it's clearly Option C. Keeping it simple with a /24 subnet mask is the way to go. No need to overthink this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
12 months ago
I think Option D is the way to go. Splitting the subnet into two equal halves with a /25 mask seems like the most efficient use of IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
12 months ago
Option B looks correct, the subnet mask 255.255.255.248 gives us 8 host bits, which should be enough for our VLAN 10 network.
upvoted 0 times
Cristal
8 months ago
True, but D has fewer usable hosts than B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
8 months ago
But what about Option D? It also seems valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
8 months ago
Agreed, 255.255.255.248 works well for 8 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
9 months ago
I think Option B is solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
12 months ago
I think the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel