Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 200-201 Exam - Topic 3 Question 105 Discussion

Posted by Rodney on Feb 11, 2025 at 05:42 PM

Refer to the exhibit.

Which alert is identified from this packet capture?

Suggested Answer: C

The screenshot shows multiple POP requests with the commandPASS, which is typically used for password entry. The rapid succession and variation of these requests suggest an attempt to guess the password, characteristic of a brute-force attack. Remember, always verify with additional data or context when possible, as packet captures can contain vast amounts of information and may require thorough analysis for accurate interpretation.


Get Premium 200-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
FI
Filiberto 11 months ago
ARP poisoning is spot on, no doubt about it!
CA
Candra 11 months ago
I thought SQL injection was more common in these cases.
VA
Vallie 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not a man-in-the-middle?
LA
Layla 11 months ago
Totally agree, definitely not a brute-force attack.
LY
Lynelle 12 months ago
Looks like ARP poisoning to me.
AR
Arlette 12 months ago
SQL injection seems unlikely here, but I can't recall the specific indicators for ARP poisoning. Need to double-check my notes!
LU
Lucy 1 year ago
I feel like brute-force attacks were covered in our last session, but this doesn't seem to fit that description.
SA
Sabra 1 year ago
I remember discussing man-in-the-middle attacks, but the packet capture looks a bit different from what we reviewed.
JE
Jeanice 1 year ago
I think this might be related to ARP poisoning, but I'm not entirely sure. We practiced a similar question in class.
SH
Sharika 1 year ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. I'll eliminate the options that don't seem to match the evidence, then focus on the remaining choices to make my best guess.
CA
Cassie 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. The packet capture doesn't seem to clearly indicate the type of attack. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
JA
Janella 1 year ago
Aha, I think this is an ARP poisoning attack based on the information in the packet capture. I'm pretty confident in that assessment.
RE
Rebecka 1 year ago
The packet capture seems to show some suspicious activity, but I'm not sure which specific attack it represents. I'll need to review my notes on common network attacks.
IN
Inocencia 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a network security question. I'll need to carefully analyze the packet capture to identify the type of attack.
ST
Stanford 2 years ago
This is easy, it's ARP poisoning all the way. Nasty stuff, but I'll take it over a SQL injection any day. At least I can understand ARP!
HE
Herminia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Stanford
User 4: SQL injection is a whole different level of threat.
FR
Francoise 2 years ago
↳ replying to Stanford
User 3: ARP poisoning is a common tactic used by hackers.
BA
Barbra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Stanford
User 2: Yeah, ARP attacks can be pretty sneaky.
TH
Theola 2 years ago
↳ replying to Stanford
User 1: I agree, ARP poisoning is definitely the alert in this packet capture.
AL
Alfreda 2 years ago
Haha, brute-force attack? Really? This is way too sophisticated for that. I'd say SQL injection is the most likely culprit.
BR
Brett 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alfreda
User 2: Yeah, brute-force attack seems too basic for this.
FR
Frederica 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alfreda
User 1: I agree, SQL injection seems more likely.
RA
Raylene 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but the packet capture looks like it could be a man-in-the-middle attack. Those are always nasty to deal with.
MO
Mozell 2 years ago
↳ replying to Raylene
User 2: No, I believe it's a brute-force attack.
EV
Evan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Raylene
User 1: I think it might be an ARP poisoning.
NU
Nu 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be a man-in-the-middle attack.
OM
Omer 2 years ago
I agree with Kenneth, the packet capture looks like ARP poisoning.
KE
Kenneth 2 years ago
I think the alert is ARP poisoning.
DI
Dick 2 years ago
This is clearly an ARP poisoning attack. The packet capture shows suspicious ARP traffic, which is a classic signature.
MA
Malcolm 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dick
We need to strengthen our network security to prevent future incidents.
AU
Audry 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dick
Do we have any security measures in place to detect and mitigate such attacks?
EL
Elly 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dick
We should take immediate action to prevent further damage.
SH
Shasta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Dick
I agree, the ARP poisoning attack is evident from the packet capture.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel