MENU
An investor, a retiree seeking steady income and global diversification through managed products, is wary of transparency issues and unexpected losses. Which of the following statements best captures a key advantage and a key disadvantage of managed products for achieving these goals?
Managed products can give an investor efficient access to securities, markets and geographic regions that would be difficult or costly to assemble independently. A globally invested mutual fund or exchange-traded fund may therefore provide broad international exposure and diversification. That is the key advantage described in option B.
The corresponding disadvantage is foreign-currency risk. When overseas holdings are valued in euros, pounds, yen or other currencies, movements against the Canadian dollar can increase or reduce the Canadian-dollar return. A foreign investment may appreciate in its local market yet still produce a loss for a Canadian investor if the foreign currency depreciates sufficiently. Currency hedging can reduce this exposure, but hedging creates costs and may not eliminate the risk completely.
Option C is defective because managed products do not guarantee consistent income. Distributions can change, and portfolio values remain exposed to market conditions. Option D incorrectly suggests that managed products inherently reduce loss potential and restrict geographic exposure; many funds are designed specifically to broaden geographic exposure. Option A does not identify the most relevant disadvantage presented in the scenario.
The Retail Securities syllabus requires analysis of managed-product exposure to income, growth, asset classes, sectors, geography and diversification, together with the products' advantages and disadvantages.
===============
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!