Discuss CIPS L6M5 Exam Topic 3 Question 24

Fred is comparing two possible projects that will last for different durations.

His company can only select one project due to financial constraints.

He needs a method to compare the financial benefits of both projects.

Q: Is a payback analysis a useful tool for Fred to use?

Answer Options:

AYes -- this will account for the difference in duration of the two projects

BNo -- this will not account for the difference in duration of the two projects

CYes -- this will provide Fred with a rate of return that is useful to accurately forecast profits

DNo -- there is no formula to calculate this, and a discount factor must be used

Suggested Answer: A

A Payback Analysis (p.72) calculates how long it takes for a project to recover its initial investment. It accounts for project duration but does not provide a rate of return (Option C). Discount factors (Option D) are used in Net Present Value (NPV) analysis, not Payback Analysis. [P.72]

Get Premium L6M5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

27 comments · newest first

Quinn 2 days ago

I think payback analysis is useful.

Gladys 7 days ago

But isn't it risky to rely solely on payback? We need a comprehensive view.

Asuncion 12 days ago

I feel like C is a better option. Rate of return is crucial for forecasting.

Pearlene 17 days ago

No way! It ignores the time value of money. We need a discount factor.

Jame 23 days ago

I agree with Alex. It helps compare cash flows over time.

Deangelo 28 days ago

But it doesn't consider project duration properly. That's a big flaw.

Santos 1 month ago

I think payback analysis is useful. It shows how long until we get our money back.

Kayleigh 1 month ago

D is valid too, discount factors are important.

Deonna 1 month ago

I like C, it shows potential profits clearly.

Cristy 2 months ago

But it won't give a full picture of returns.

Karan 2 months ago

Option A makes sense, it helps compare timelines.

Abel 2 months ago

I disagree, it doesn't consider project duration.

Lindsey 2 months ago

I think payback analysis is useful.

Shanda 2 months ago

A discount factor is definitely needed for accurate comparisons.

Felix 2 months ago

Wait, there's no formula for this? That sounds off.

Solange 3 months ago

I thought payback could help with forecasting profits?

Britt 3 months ago

Totally agree, it’s not the best method for this!

Mattie 3 months ago

Payback analysis doesn't consider project duration properly.

Kaitlyn 3 months ago

It’s all about the cash flow timing, so I say no.

Dierdre 3 months ago

Wait, can’t you just adjust the payback period for duration?

Alica 4 months ago

I thought payback analysis was supposed to help with that?

Gwen 4 months ago

Totally agree, it’s not the best method for this!

Derick 4 months ago

A payback analysis doesn't consider project duration differences.

Denny 4 months ago

I vaguely remember that we talked about discount factors being important for comparing projects of different lengths, so maybe payback isn't the best choice here.

Daron 4 months ago

I feel like payback analysis could be useful, but I can't recall if it gives a clear picture of long-term profitability.

Carey 4 months ago

I think we did a practice question where payback period was mentioned, and it seemed like it only focused on cash flow timing, not duration differences.

Willodean 6 months ago

I remember discussing payback analysis in class, but I'm not sure it really considers project duration effectively.

CIPS L6M5 Exam - Topic 3 Question 24 Discussion