Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 10 Question 40 Discussion

Posted by Lajuana on May 19, 2024 at 10:07 AM

Which one of the following is an advantage of early supplier involvement?

Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is 'Sudden changes in the marketplace' -- this is a reason a buyer would be reactive. Reactive is when something happens to you and it forces you to act in a certain way. The other options would be strategic rather than reactive. P. 163


Get Premium L4M6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
CH
Chaya 11 months ago
B is a downside, not an advantage!
CH
Chanel 11 months ago
A sounds risky, not sure why anyone would pick that.
LA
Lashawn 12 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems too good to be true.
RO
Roy 12 months ago
I agree, C makes the most sense here.
LA
Laquanda 1 year ago
C is definitely the best choice! Understanding capabilities is key.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
I’m not sure about the intellectual property risks part; it seems like that could be a concern regardless of when you involve suppliers.
JI
Jina 1 year ago
I feel like option C makes the most sense because knowing what suppliers can do is crucial for project success.
MA
Margery 1 year ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned something about communication with suppliers being important, but I can't recall if it was an advantage or a disadvantage.
TE
Terrilyn 1 year ago
I think early supplier involvement helps with understanding supplier capabilities, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main advantage.
SH
Shawnee 1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Some of these options don't seem like clear advantages. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.
JA
Janine 1 year ago
Ah, I think I've got it! Early supplier involvement allows you to better understand their capabilities, which is a key advantage. I'm feeling confident about this one.
IV
Ivette 1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm pretty sure the right answer has to do with understanding the supplier's capabilities, but I want to double-check the other options just in case.
LE
Levi 1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about the advantages of early supplier involvement. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
TA
Tamesha 1 year ago
I feel confident that the correct answer is D. Both B and C seem like reasonable statements about functional size measurement.
MA
Major 1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the key is to have a shared definition of done across all the teams. Option C seems like the best approach to me.
ED
Edgar 1 year ago
Okay, I think I know how to approach this. I'll compare the Micro instance resources to Oracle's requirements and see if they meet the recommended configuration.
UL
Ula 1 year ago
Option A sounds like a lawyer's dream, but I don't think it's an advantage for the company. Gotta go with C.
CR
Cristen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ula
Magda: Yeah, I think we can all agree that option C is the way to go.
FA
Fausto 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ula
User 3: Option C definitely seems like the most beneficial for the company.
MA
Magda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ula
User 2: I think option C is the best choice for early supplier involvement.
RO
Roslyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Ula
User 1: I agree, option A doesn't seem like a real advantage.
JA
Jarvis 2 years ago
Ha! Option D is clearly a joke answer. No need for non-disclosure agreements? Yeah, right!
IR
Irma 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
Early supplier involvement can lead to better collaboration and innovation, but it definitely requires confidentiality agreements.
FL
Fletcher 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
I agree, without non-disclosure agreements, there could be serious risks involved.
RI
Richelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Jarvis
Option D is definitely a joke, non-disclosure agreements are crucial in supplier involvement.
CA
Carlee 2 years ago
I would have to disagree. Option B seems like a major downside to me. Who wants to invest heavily in supplier communications?
CA
Carisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Carlee
User 3: I agree with Kindra, understanding supplier capabilities is crucial for success.
KI
Kindra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Carlee
User 2: I see your point, but I still believe option A is the most important.
ME
Melinda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Carlee
User 1: I think option C is the best advantage of early supplier involvement.
LU
Luisa 2 years ago
Option C is definitely the advantage. Understanding supplier capabilities is key for early involvement.
TA
Talia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Luisa
I agree, knowing what the supplier can offer early on can help with planning and decision making.
RO
Rolande 1 year ago
↳ replying to Luisa
Option C is definitely the advantage. Understanding supplier capabilities is key for early involvement.
JA
Janey 2 years ago
But what about the large investment in supplier communications? Wouldn't that be a disadvantage?
MI
Mitsue 2 years ago
I agree with Graciela, knowing what the supplier can do early on can help with decision making.
GR
Graciela 2 years ago
I think the advantage of early supplier involvement is understanding of supplier capabilities.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel