Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 10 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M6 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 10
[All L4M6 Questions]

Which one of the following is an advantage of early supplier involvement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is 'Sudden changes in the marketplace' -- this is a reason a buyer would be reactive. Reactive is when something happens to you and it forces you to act in a certain way. The other options would be strategic rather than reactive. P. 163


by Lajuana at May 19, 2024, 10:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L4M6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Chaya
6 months ago
B is a downside, not an advantage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
6 months ago
A sounds risky, not sure why anyone would pick that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
6 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
7 months ago
I agree, C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
7 months ago
C is definitely the best choice! Understanding capabilities is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
7 months ago
I’m not sure about the intellectual property risks part; it seems like that could be a concern regardless of when you involve suppliers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
7 months ago
I feel like option C makes the most sense because knowing what suppliers can do is crucial for project success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
7 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned something about communication with suppliers being important, but I can't recall if it was an advantage or a disadvantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
8 months ago
I think early supplier involvement helps with understanding supplier capabilities, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
8 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Some of these options don't seem like clear advantages. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
8 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it! Early supplier involvement allows you to better understand their capabilities, which is a key advantage. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm pretty sure the right answer has to do with understanding the supplier's capabilities, but I want to double-check the other options just in case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about the advantages of early supplier involvement. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
8 months ago
I feel confident that the correct answer is D. Both B and C seem like reasonable statements about functional size measurement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
8 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the key is to have a shared definition of done across all the teams. Option C seems like the best approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
8 months ago
Okay, I think I know how to approach this. I'll compare the Micro instance resources to Oracle's requirements and see if they meet the recommended configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
1 year ago
Option A sounds like a lawyer's dream, but I don't think it's an advantage for the company. Gotta go with C.
upvoted 0 times
Cristen
11 months ago
Magda: Yeah, I think we can all agree that option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
11 months ago
User 3: Option C definitely seems like the most beneficial for the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
12 months ago
User 2: I think option C is the best choice for early supplier involvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
12 months ago
User 1: I agree, option A doesn't seem like a real advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jarvis
1 year ago
Ha! Option D is clearly a joke answer. No need for non-disclosure agreements? Yeah, right!
upvoted 0 times
Irma
12 months ago
Early supplier involvement can lead to better collaboration and innovation, but it definitely requires confidentiality agreements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
12 months ago
I agree, without non-disclosure agreements, there could be serious risks involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
12 months ago
Option D is definitely a joke, non-disclosure agreements are crucial in supplier involvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlee
1 year ago
I would have to disagree. Option B seems like a major downside to me. Who wants to invest heavily in supplier communications?
upvoted 0 times
Carisa
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Kindra, understanding supplier capabilities is crucial for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
1 year ago
User 2: I see your point, but I still believe option A is the most important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
1 year ago
User 1: I think option C is the best advantage of early supplier involvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the advantage. Understanding supplier capabilities is key for early involvement.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
1 year ago
I agree, knowing what the supplier can offer early on can help with planning and decision making.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the advantage. Understanding supplier capabilities is key for early involvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janey
1 year ago
But what about the large investment in supplier communications? Wouldn't that be a disadvantage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
I agree with Graciela, knowing what the supplier can do early on can help with decision making.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
1 year ago
I think the advantage of early supplier involvement is understanding of supplier capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel