Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 10 Question 40 Discussion

Which one of the following is an advantage of early supplier involvement?
C) Understanding of supplier capabilities
A) Supplier is responsible for all intellectual property risks
B) Large investment in supplier communications
D) No need for supplier non-disclosure agreements

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 10 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M6 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 10
[All L4M6 Questions]

Which one of the following is an advantage of early supplier involvement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The correct answer is 'Sudden changes in the marketplace' -- this is a reason a buyer would be reactive. Reactive is when something happens to you and it forces you to act in a certain way. The other options would be strategic rather than reactive. P. 163


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Chaya
7 months ago
B is a downside, not an advantage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chanel
8 months ago
A sounds risky, not sure why anyone would pick that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
8 months ago
I agree, C makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
8 months ago
C is definitely the best choice! Understanding capabilities is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
9 months ago
I’m not sure about the intellectual property risks part; it seems like that could be a concern regardless of when you involve suppliers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
9 months ago
I feel like option C makes the most sense because knowing what suppliers can do is crucial for project success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
9 months ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned something about communication with suppliers being important, but I can't recall if it was an advantage or a disadvantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
9 months ago
I think early supplier involvement helps with understanding supplier capabilities, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
9 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Some of these options don't seem like clear advantages. I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
9 months ago
Ah, I think I've got it! Early supplier involvement allows you to better understand their capabilities, which is a key advantage. I'm feeling confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
9 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I'm pretty sure the right answer has to do with understanding the supplier's capabilities, but I want to double-check the other options just in case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
9 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about the advantages of early supplier involvement. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
9 months ago
I feel confident that the correct answer is D. Both B and C seem like reasonable statements about functional size measurement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
9 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I think the key is to have a shared definition of done across all the teams. Option C seems like the best approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
10 months ago
Okay, I think I know how to approach this. I'll compare the Micro instance resources to Oracle's requirements and see if they meet the recommended configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
1 year ago
Option A sounds like a lawyer's dream, but I don't think it's an advantage for the company. Gotta go with C.
upvoted 0 times
Cristen
1 year ago
Magda: Yeah, I think we can all agree that option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
User 3: Option C definitely seems like the most beneficial for the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
1 year ago
User 2: I think option C is the best choice for early supplier involvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, option A doesn't seem like a real advantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jarvis
1 year ago
Ha! Option D is clearly a joke answer. No need for non-disclosure agreements? Yeah, right!
upvoted 0 times
Irma
1 year ago
Early supplier involvement can lead to better collaboration and innovation, but it definitely requires confidentiality agreements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
I agree, without non-disclosure agreements, there could be serious risks involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
1 year ago
Option D is definitely a joke, non-disclosure agreements are crucial in supplier involvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlee
1 year ago
I would have to disagree. Option B seems like a major downside to me. Who wants to invest heavily in supplier communications?
upvoted 0 times
Carisa
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Kindra, understanding supplier capabilities is crucial for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
1 year ago
User 2: I see your point, but I still believe option A is the most important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
1 year ago
User 1: I think option C is the best advantage of early supplier involvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the advantage. Understanding supplier capabilities is key for early involvement.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
1 year ago
I agree, knowing what the supplier can offer early on can help with planning and decision making.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
1 year ago
Option C is definitely the advantage. Understanding supplier capabilities is key for early involvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janey
1 year ago
But what about the large investment in supplier communications? Wouldn't that be a disadvantage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
1 year ago
I agree with Graciela, knowing what the supplier can do early on can help with decision making.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
1 year ago
I think the advantage of early supplier involvement is understanding of supplier capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel