Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS L4M6 Exam - Topic 1 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M6 exam

Question #: 66
Topic #: 1

[All L4M6 Questions]

[Relationship approaches and the sourcing process]

Which one of the following is an advantage of early supplier involvement?

ASupplier is responsible for all intellectual property risks

BLarge investment in supplier communications

CUnderstanding of supplier capabilities

DNo need for supplier non-disclosure agreements

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Vashti at Jul 11, 2025, 04:50 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L4M6 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Aretha

8 months ago

Large investment in communication? Sounds like a downside to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenny

9 months ago

Wow, I never thought about it that way!

upvoted 0 times

...

Nichelle

9 months ago

I disagree, A seems more relevant to risk management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reena

9 months ago

Really? No need for NDAs? That sounds too good to be true!

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

9 months ago

C is definitely the right choice! Understanding capabilities is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizbeth

9 months ago

I agree with Avery, but I also wonder if there are other benefits we might be overlooking, like reducing risks in the sourcing process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

10 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the options. I feel like large investments in communication could be a downside rather than an advantage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

10 months ago

I remember practicing a question like this, and I think option C makes the most sense because knowing what suppliers can do is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

10 months ago

I think early supplier involvement helps with understanding supplier capabilities, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main advantage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aliza

10 months ago

Okay, I think the key here is that early supplier involvement gives the company more insight into the supplier's capabilities. That's why C is the best answer - it allows for a deeper understanding upfront. The other options don't seem as directly relevant to the question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

11 months ago

Ugh, I'm really struggling with this one. The options all seem plausible, and I'm not sure I fully understand the advantages of early supplier involvement. I'll have to review my notes and try to reason through it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nakita

11 months ago

I'm pretty confident the answer is C. Early supplier involvement allows the company to better understand the supplier's strengths and limitations, which is a key advantage. A and D don't seem as relevant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I was thinking maybe B, large investment in supplier communications, could also be an advantage of early involvement. But C makes sense too. I'll have to think it through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonette

11 months ago

This question seems straightforward - I think the answer is C, understanding of supplier capabilities. Early supplier involvement would give the company more insight into what the supplier can actually provide.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linn

12 months ago

Haha, early supplier involvement? More like 'early supplier headache'! But in all seriousness, C is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Dean

11 months ago

But headaches do come with it sometimes!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

11 months ago

True! Still, option C has so many benefits!

upvoted 0 times

...

Telma

11 months ago

Early involvement can really streamline the sourcing process!

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Stefania

1 year ago

I don't think that's as important as knowing what the supplier can actually deliver.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deandrea

1 year ago

D) No need for supplier non-disclosure agreements? Are you kidding me? That's just asking for trouble. Gotta protect that IP, folks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malissa

1 year ago

But what about the other options? Like supplier being responsible for intellectual property risks?

upvoted 0 times

...

Staci

1 year ago

I agree with Bea, knowing what the supplier can do early on is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martin

1 year ago

B) Large investment in supplier communications? Sounds like a recipe for a budget nightmare. I'll pass on that option.

upvoted 0 times

Rene

11 months ago

B) Large investment in supplier communications? That does sound like it could get expensive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

12 months ago

C) Understanding of supplier capabilities

upvoted 0 times

...

Leoma

12 months ago

A) Supplier is responsible for all intellectual property risks

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Bea

1 year ago

I think the advantage of early supplier involvement is understanding of supplier capabilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

1 year ago

A) Supplier is responsible for all intellectual property risks? No way, that's a huge liability. I'd steer clear of that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

1 year ago

C) Understanding of supplier capabilities - definitely the way to go. You can't plan a successful project without knowing what your suppliers can bring to the table.

upvoted 0 times

Kristofer

1 year ago

A) Supplier is responsible for all intellectual property risks - that's a big advantage too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

1 year ago

C) Understanding of supplier capabilities is crucial for a successful project.

upvoted 0 times

...

...