Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L4M2 Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M2 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 5
[All L4M2 Questions]

Which of the following will help the bargaining strength of a buyer?

The buyer has the option to make the product in-house

There are a limited number of suppliers available to the buyer

The buyer's switching costs are high

The buyer's spend is a high proportion of the supplier's revenue

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

1 (Make in-house): The ability to produce in-house reduces dependency on suppliers, strengthening buyer power.

4 (High spend proportion): A high proportion of spend gives buyers leverage over suppliers who are reliant on their revenue.

Limited suppliers (2) and high switching costs (3) reduce buyer bargaining power. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Market Power Analysis.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cherrie
4 days ago
That's a good point, I see your rationale. Maybe C) 1 and 4 only is the correct answer after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
4 days ago
I'm going with B) 2 and 4 only. It's a no-brainer - the fewer the suppliers, the more the buyer holds the cards. And the supplier's revenue depends on the buyer, so that's a big bargaining chip.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
5 days ago
But if the buyer has the option to make the product in-house and their spend is a high proportion of the supplier's revenue, wouldn't that increase their bargaining strength?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
6 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 1 and 4 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
6 days ago
D) 2 and 3 only. High switching costs for the buyer are a clear disadvantage, so that can't be the right answer. The limited suppliers and the buyer's spend are the key factors here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
10 days ago
I think the answer is A) 1 and 2 only.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
11 days ago
C) 1 and 4 only. If the buyer can make the product in-house, that's a huge advantage. And a high proportion of the supplier's revenue is definitely a win for the buyer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
14 days ago
I think the answer is B) 2 and 4 only. The more limited the suppliers and the higher the buyer's spend, the stronger the buyer's bargaining position.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel