Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L4M2 Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M2 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 1
[All L4M2 Questions]

Which of the following are likely to be disadvantages of using outcome-based specifications? Select THREE that apply

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, F

An Outcome Based Specification (OBS) focuses on the desired outcome of a service in business terms, rather than a detailed technical specification of how the service is to be provided; this allows providers scope to propose innovative solutions that might not have occurred to the procurement team. Outcome should be distinguished from output, which is the measurable results of a set of inputs. The example of difference between outcome and output is written at the bottom of page 123 in the study guide.

Outcomes should be the starting point in making new specification. However, using outcome-based specification has some setbacks:

- First, it is not easy to measure the outcomes. Usually, outcome of a project is a statement like 'increase customer satisfaction', 'maintain ambient temperature' or 'provide a convenient way to do something'. They are not easy to measure as output.

- Second, sometimes the desired outcomes require time to be materialised

- Third, outcomes can be ambiguous


LO3, AC 3.1

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kami
27 days ago
I believe difficulty to measure performance is another disadvantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 months ago
As an engineer, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't include any outcome-based questions. Talk about a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
India
18 days ago
E) Responsibility for product failure falling to buyer
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
22 days ago
C) Difficulty to measure performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
23 days ago
A) Time consuming to produce
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cammy
1 months ago
D? Really? Who cares about the time delay, we're more concerned about the pain of actually creating these specs in the first place. A, B, and F for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It can also stifle innovation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
2 months ago
Haha, E is the real winner here. Nothing like shifting the blame for product failures to the poor buyer! But in all seriousness, A, B, and F are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lynda
20 days ago
I agree, A, B, and F are definitely major disadvantages of using outcome-based specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
25 days ago
Yeah, E is definitely a sneaky one. Buyers shouldn't have to take the fall for product failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verona
2 months ago
I think using outcome-based specifications can be time consuming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
2 months ago
I'd go with A, C, and F. Measuring performance with these types of specs can be a real headache, and the ambiguity is a major drawback.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
2 months ago
A, B, and F seem like the obvious choices here. Outcome-based specs can definitely be time-consuming and stifle innovation if not done carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Wendell
18 days ago
Yes, those are valid points. It's important to consider all the potential drawbacks before implementing outcome-based specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanice
23 days ago
I agree, time-consuming and stifling innovation are big concerns. Ambiguity of outcome can also be a problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
1 months ago
A, B, and F are definitely major disadvantages. It can be a long process and limit creativity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel