New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L3M5 Exam - Topic 4 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L3M5 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 4
[All L3M5 Questions]

In 2013, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported that it is highly likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of global warming since the 1950's. What was their level of certainty?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

95% plus level of certainty.


by Alaine at Sep 16, 2024, 02:33 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L3M5 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rickie
3 months ago
Wait, 95%? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
3 months ago
I thought it was more like 75%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
3 months ago
Totally agree, human impact is huge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
4 months ago
Really? That seems a bit high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
4 months ago
They said 95%+ certainty!
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think they said it was likely, which might mean around 60%? I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
4 months ago
I practiced a question like this, and I feel like they emphasized the strong evidence. Could it be 95%+?
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
4 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about it being more than just a guess. Was it 75%?
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
5 months ago
I think the IPCC mentioned something about a high level of certainty, maybe around 95%? That sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
5 months ago
I think the key here is the phrase "highly likely." That suggests a pretty high level of certainty, so I'm leaning towards the 95%+ option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question says it's "highly likely" that humans have caused global warming, so I'm guessing that means a high level of certainty, maybe around 75% or 95%+.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. The question doesn't explicitly state the level of certainty, so I'm not sure if I can confidently choose an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is 95%+, since the question says it's "highly likely" that human influence has been the dominant cause of global warming.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
1 year ago
95%+? Wow, that's practically a sure thing. I bet those climate scientists are feeling pretty confident in their abilities to predict the future.
upvoted 0 times
Corrinne
1 year ago
B) 50%
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
1 year ago
Yes, they are very confident in their findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
1 year ago
A) 95%+
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Levi
1 year ago
Hey, 50% means they're basically guessing. Maybe they should try flipping a coin instead of all those fancy models.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
1 year ago
75%? That's a lot of uncertainty for such a critical issue. We need more solid data to make important decisions.
upvoted 0 times
Yolande
1 year ago
C) 60%
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
1 year ago
B) 50%
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
1 year ago
A) 95%
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Peggie
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think the answer is A) 95%+ because the IPCC is a reputable source
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 year ago
60%? That's like flipping a coin. I think they should be more confident in their findings.
upvoted 0 times
Kirby
1 year ago
B) 50%
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
1 year ago
Yeah, they should be more certain with such an important issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
1 year ago
I agree, 60% does seem low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Man
1 year ago
A) 95%+
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alana
1 year ago
I agree with Dannette, the IPCC was very certain about human influence on global warming
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) 95%+
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
1 year ago
95%+ sounds about right, those climate scientists really know their stuff. I'm impressed by their level of certainty.
upvoted 0 times
Francene
1 year ago
No, it was actually 95%+ according to the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
1 year ago
B) 50%
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
1 year ago
Yes, it's reassuring to know that the experts are so confident in their findings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
1 year ago
I agree, the level of certainty is impressive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latia
1 year ago
I agree, the level of certainty is impressive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
1 year ago
A) 95%+
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
1 year ago
A) 95%+
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel