MENU
Which one of the following could not be classed as a form of performance specification?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium L3M3 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Since performance specifications are all to do with outputs, 'input-driven' leaps out as being the cor-rect answer here.
13 comments · newest first
HY
Hyman
2 months ago
Input-driven just tells you what to do, not how well.
SH
Sherill
2 months ago
Exactly! Performance specs should be about outcomes.
LA
Latia
2 months ago
Yeah, it doesn't focus on results.
MO
Mozell
2 months ago
I think D) Input-driven is the answer.
CA
Catalina
2 months ago
I thought input-driven could be a type too, interesting!
GR
Gretchen
3 months ago
Functional specs are the way to go!
MA
Marshall
3 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit odd.
JE
Jenise
3 months ago
I totally agree, input-driven doesn't fit the bill.
NA
Nan
3 months ago
Input-driven is definitely not a performance spec.
CL
Cletus
3 months ago
I have a vague memory that input-driven relates more to the resources used rather than the performance itself, so that could be the answer.
LE
Leoma
3 months ago
I practiced a question like this before, and I feel like outcome-focused and output-based are definitely forms of performance specs, so it must be D.
WE
Wendell
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about functional specifications being more about how things work rather than just inputs.
MA
Matthew
4 months ago
I think performance specifications are usually about what the end result should be, so maybe D) Input-driven doesn't fit?