Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 5 Question 93 Discussion

Posted by Winfred on Jul 09, 2025 at 01:50 PM

FGT is evaluating the political risks associated with its operations around the world.

Which of the following would indicate that a particular subsidiary has a high level ofpolitical risk?

Suggested Answer: A, B, C

Get Premium CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
28 comments · newest first
KA
Kassandra 10 months ago
Surprised that employing locals could indicate high risk.
ME
Meghan 10 months ago
Totally agree, political instability is a huge risk factor!
GE
Geraldine 11 months ago
I think local partner requirements can be a red flag too.
VA
Vannessa 11 months ago
Really? I thought lax company laws were a good thing.
MA
Margret 11 months ago
A forthcoming election usually means uncertainty.
MA
Marla 11 months ago
I’m not convinced that distance from the home country, like in option D, really indicates political risk. It seems more about logistics than politics.
HA
Halina 12 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I think option C about lax company law could definitely signal high political risk. It makes me uneasy about compliance.
DA
Dalene 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think having to partner with locals, like in option B, could also suggest a higher risk. It feels like it could complicate things.
LY
Lyndia 12 months ago
I remember discussing how forthcoming elections can create uncertainty, so I think option A might indicate high political risk.
AR
Aron 1 year ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of political risk. I'll make sure to carefully consider each factor and select the ones that are most indicative of high risk for the subsidiary.
AS
Ashanti 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Upcoming elections, local partner requirements, and lax regulations are all clear signs of high political risk. I'll make sure to select those options.
CA
Carri 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know political risk is important, but I'm not sure I fully understand all the factors that indicate high risk. I'll need to think this through carefully.
CE
Cecilia 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about identifying political risk factors. I'll focus on the key factors like upcoming elections, local partner requirements, and lax regulations.
AN
Angelyn 1 year ago
Haha, C is a classic trap answer. 'Lax company law' might mean less red tape, but it could also mean less protection for foreign businesses. B is the way to go.
BI
Billy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Angelyn
I agree, C can be misleading. B seems like the safer option.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
I think both factors are important in assessing political risk, along with the lax company law in the host country.
FR
Francesco 1 year ago
That's true, having to rely on local partners can make the subsidiary vulnerable to political changes.
TA
Taryn 1 year ago
But what about the requirement for local partners to operate? That could also indicate high political risk.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
I agree with Francesco, political instability during elections can pose a risk.
FR
Francesco 1 year ago
I think forthcoming elections in the host country would indicate high political risk.
AN
Annette 1 year ago
D seems like an odd choice. Being far from the home country doesn't necessarily mean higher political risk. I'd go with B as well.
MA
Mariann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annette
C) Company law in the subsidiary host country is lax.
JA
Jani 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annette
B) The subsidiary's host country requires the active participation of local partners before the subsidiary can operate.
LE
Lera 1 year ago
↳ replying to Annette
A) Forthcoming elections in the subsidiary's host country.
KI
Kimberlie 1 year ago
I think the answer is B. Requiring local partners indicates the government wants to maintain control and influence over foreign operations, which can increase political risk.
SA
Sabine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimberlie
That's true, elections can bring uncertainty and instability, which are factors in political risk.
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimberlie
But what about forthcoming elections in the host country? Wouldn't that also indicate high political risk?
AL
Almeta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kimberlie
I agree, having local partners can increase political risk.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel