Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Topic 4 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 4
[All CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Questions]

An electricity company owns and operates a nuclear power station located ten miles from a large city. A recent and very extensive engineering examination of the power station concludes with the estimate that the probability of a major nuclear disaster within the next 20 years is 0.2%.

Which of the following best explains the relevance of quantifying the risk in that way?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Virgina
5 days ago
Quantifying the risk is great and all, but I'm more concerned about what they plan to do to mitigate that 0.2% chance. Maybe they can give everyone in the city a radiation-proof suit just in case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
8 days ago
But does a 0.2% probability really provide enough information?
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
8 days ago
Wow, 0.2% probability of a major nuclear disaster? That's like winning the lottery, but in reverse. I guess the engineers are trying to lull us into a false sense of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
15 days ago
I agree, it helps the company assess the potential consequences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
17 days ago
I think quantifying the risk is important for decision-making.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel