Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 2
[All CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Questions]

YY is a company which generates electricity from alternative energy sources It has just begun constructing a wind farm near a well-known beauty spot The protect has been controversial as campaigners say it will be noisy and unsightly.

The campaigners took legal action but lost the case Some of them have started a campaign of direct action against YY and are physically blocking roads leading to the site and attempting to intimidate YY's staff

YY has hired a security company to help it to protect its staff

Which of the following statements are view in relation to the ethics of this scenario''

Select ALL that apply.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

by Effie at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRO19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carmen
2 days ago
The security firm should definitely use minimal force, ethics matter!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
7 days ago
The beauty spot matters too, not just the energy source!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
12 days ago
Wait, so they can't lobby anymore just because they lost? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
17 days ago
I disagree, the protestors have a right to voice their concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
22 days ago
YY is just protecting their staff, totally within their rights!
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
27 days ago
D is spot on. Renewable energy is crucial, so the protestors' complaints shouldn't take priority. But B is important too - no need for heavy-handed tactics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregg
2 months ago
Haha, the protestors must be really desperate if they're trying to "intimidate" the staff. C is just plain wrong - YY still has a duty of care.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
I agree with A, B, and D. The protestors lost their case, so YY is justified in hiring security. But the security firm should avoid excessive force.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 months ago
A, B, and D are correct. YY has a duty to protect its employees, but the security firm must use only necessary force. The environmental benefits of the wind farm outweigh the protestors' concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
2 months ago
D feels a bit extreme to me; I think the protestors' concerns should still be taken seriously, even if renewable energy is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
2 months ago
I think B makes sense too, as the security firm should only use necessary force, but I wonder how that would be measured in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
2 months ago
I'm not sure about C; just because the protestors lost in court doesn't mean they don't have rights or that YY can ignore their safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
3 months ago
I remember discussing the duty of care in class, so I think A is definitely a valid point for YY.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
3 months ago
This is a classic case of conflicting ethical obligations. I'll need to weigh the rights and responsibilities of the company, the protestors, and the broader public interest. My approach will be to try to find a balanced solution that respects the different ethical considerations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
3 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to consider the competing ethical obligations and rights of the different parties involved. I'll make sure to address the nuances and avoid taking a strong stance on any one position.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. There are valid arguments on both sides. I'll need to carefully analyze the different ethical principles at play, like duty of care, the right to protest, and the importance of renewable energy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. It's not totally clear to me how the different statements relate to the ethics of the scenario. I'll need to read through it carefully and think about the underlying ethical principles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
4 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'll focus on identifying the key ethical considerations and weighing the different perspectives.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel