Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P02-1 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 4
[All CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Questions]

The following calculation of the net present value (NPV) of a project has been produced.

By how much can the forecast revenue decrease before the project is not viable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lorean at Jul 08, 2024, 07:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Colette
4 months ago
Definitely not $20,000, that's way off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
5 months ago
How can we be sure about these numbers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
5 months ago
$21,380 seems too specific, doesn't it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
I think it's actually option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
5 months ago
Looks like option B is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
6 months ago
I think option B, 35.6%, sounds familiar from our case studies on project viability thresholds. It might be the right choice, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
6 months ago
I feel like I should know this, but I can't recall the exact method for calculating how much revenue can drop before the NPV turns negative.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
6 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we had to determine the break-even point for a project. I think it might be related to the percentage decrease in revenue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
6 months ago
I remember we discussed how to calculate the sensitivity of NPV to changes in revenue, but I'm not entirely sure how to apply that here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
6 months ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one. I'm a bit lost on where to start. Maybe I'll try sketching out the cash flows first before jumping into the NPV formula.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
6 months ago
Okay, I think I got this. If I can figure out the revenue threshold where the NPV hits zero, that should give me the answer. Time to crunch some numbers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
6 months ago
Hmm, not sure I fully understand this NPV stuff. Guess I'll have to read through the material again and try to break down the calculation step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
6 months ago
This looks like a straightforward NPV calculation problem. I'll need to review the formula and inputs to determine how much the revenue can decrease.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
6 months ago
This seems straightforward. Physical tampering prevention is a way to secure the physical aspects of banking controls, like preventing unauthorized access or damage. I'm going with True on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Danner Bank is loaning money to CareWell, so they have a direct financial interest. And since Danner Bank is the lender, they would be considered an internal user, not an external one. The answer has to be A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
7 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Isn't 802.1ag about continuity check and connectivity monitoring? I'm not sure how end-to-end bit error rates would fit into that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B, but I'm also pretty sure my calculator is held together with duct tape and dreams. Fingers crossed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
11 months ago
B) 35.6% is the way to go. I mean, who doesn't love a good 35.6% revenue decrease? It's the spice of life!
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
9 months ago
D) $21,380 in total
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
9 months ago
C) $20,000 per year
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
10 months ago
B) 35.6%
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
10 months ago
A) 7.2%
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mayra
12 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Guess I'll go with B, since a 35.6% decrease seems more realistic than a fixed dollar amount.
upvoted 0 times
Dorsey
11 months ago
Bobbye: Okay, I'll go with B) 35.6% as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
11 months ago
User 3: I agree with Carry, a percentage decrease seems more realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
11 months ago
User 2: I'm not sure, I'm leaning towards B) 35.6% decrease.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
11 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is D) $21,380 in total.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marylou
12 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B. It makes sense that the revenue can decrease by a significant amount before the project becomes unviable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
12 months ago
But if the revenue decreases by $20,000 per year, the project may not be viable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe it can decrease by 7.2%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
12 months ago
The correct answer is B) 35.6%. This represents the maximum decrease in forecast revenue before the project becomes not viable, based on the given NPV calculation.
upvoted 0 times
Dominga
11 months ago
That's correct. The NPV calculation shows that a decrease of 35.6% in forecast revenue is the limit before the project becomes not viable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
11 months ago
I think the forecast revenue can decrease by 35.6% before the project is not viable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
1 year ago
I think the forecast revenue can decrease by $20,000 per year.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel