New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P02-1 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 4
[All CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Questions]

The following calculation of the net present value (NPV) of a project has been produced.

By how much can the forecast revenue decrease before the project is not viable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lorean at Jul 08, 2024, 07:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Colette
3 months ago
Definitely not $20,000, that's way off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
3 months ago
How can we be sure about these numbers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
3 months ago
$21,380 seems too specific, doesn't it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
4 months ago
I think it's actually option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
4 months ago
Looks like option B is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
4 months ago
I think option B, 35.6%, sounds familiar from our case studies on project viability thresholds. It might be the right choice, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
4 months ago
I feel like I should know this, but I can't recall the exact method for calculating how much revenue can drop before the NPV turns negative.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
4 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we had to determine the break-even point for a project. I think it might be related to the percentage decrease in revenue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
5 months ago
I remember we discussed how to calculate the sensitivity of NPV to changes in revenue, but I'm not entirely sure how to apply that here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
5 months ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one. I'm a bit lost on where to start. Maybe I'll try sketching out the cash flows first before jumping into the NPV formula.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
5 months ago
Okay, I think I got this. If I can figure out the revenue threshold where the NPV hits zero, that should give me the answer. Time to crunch some numbers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
5 months ago
Hmm, not sure I fully understand this NPV stuff. Guess I'll have to read through the material again and try to break down the calculation step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanford
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward NPV calculation problem. I'll need to review the formula and inputs to determine how much the revenue can decrease.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
5 months ago
This seems straightforward. Physical tampering prevention is a way to secure the physical aspects of banking controls, like preventing unauthorized access or damage. I'm going with True on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. Danner Bank is loaning money to CareWell, so they have a direct financial interest. And since Danner Bank is the lender, they would be considered an internal user, not an external one. The answer has to be A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Isn't 802.1ag about continuity check and connectivity monitoring? I'm not sure how end-to-end bit error rates would fit into that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B, but I'm also pretty sure my calculator is held together with duct tape and dreams. Fingers crossed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
9 months ago
B) 35.6% is the way to go. I mean, who doesn't love a good 35.6% revenue decrease? It's the spice of life!
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
8 months ago
D) $21,380 in total
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
8 months ago
C) $20,000 per year
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
8 months ago
B) 35.6%
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
8 months ago
A) 7.2%
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mayra
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Guess I'll go with B, since a 35.6% decrease seems more realistic than a fixed dollar amount.
upvoted 0 times
Dorsey
9 months ago
Bobbye: Okay, I'll go with B) 35.6% as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
9 months ago
User 3: I agree with Carry, a percentage decrease seems more realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
10 months ago
User 2: I'm not sure, I'm leaning towards B) 35.6% decrease.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
10 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is D) $21,380 in total.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marylou
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B. It makes sense that the revenue can decrease by a significant amount before the project becomes unviable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
10 months ago
But if the revenue decreases by $20,000 per year, the project may not be viable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe it can decrease by 7.2%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
10 months ago
The correct answer is B) 35.6%. This represents the maximum decrease in forecast revenue before the project becomes not viable, based on the given NPV calculation.
upvoted 0 times
Dominga
9 months ago
That's correct. The NPV calculation shows that a decrease of 35.6% in forecast revenue is the limit before the project becomes not viable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
9 months ago
I think the forecast revenue can decrease by 35.6% before the project is not viable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Skye
11 months ago
I think the forecast revenue can decrease by $20,000 per year.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel