MENU
The following calculation of the net present value (NPV) of a project has been produced.
By how much can the forecast revenue decrease before the project is not viable?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
CO
Colette
11 months ago
Definitely not $20,000, that's way off!
FR
Fredric
11 months ago
How can we be sure about these numbers?
GW
Gwen
11 months ago
$21,380 seems too specific, doesn't it?
CH
Christiane
12 months ago
I think it's actually option A.
KI
King
12 months ago
Looks like option B is the right choice!
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
I think option B, 35.6%, sounds familiar from our case studies on project viability thresholds. It might be the right choice, but I need to double-check my notes.
SV
Svetlana
1 year ago
I feel like I should know this, but I can't recall the exact method for calculating how much revenue can drop before the NPV turns negative.
LO
Lorean
1 year ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we had to determine the break-even point for a project. I think it might be related to the percentage decrease in revenue.
CO
Corinne
1 year ago
I remember we discussed how to calculate the sensitivity of NPV to changes in revenue, but I'm not entirely sure how to apply that here.
DE
Deeanna
1 year ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one. I'm a bit lost on where to start. Maybe I'll try sketching out the cash flows first before jumping into the NPV formula.
KR
Kristian
1 year ago
Okay, I think I got this. If I can figure out the revenue threshold where the NPV hits zero, that should give me the answer. Time to crunch some numbers!
MA
Maddie
1 year ago
Hmm, not sure I fully understand this NPV stuff. Guess I'll have to read through the material again and try to break down the calculation step-by-step.
ST
Stanford
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward NPV calculation problem. I'll need to review the formula and inputs to determine how much the revenue can decrease.
ER
Ernestine
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. Physical tampering prevention is a way to secure the physical aspects of banking controls, like preventing unauthorized access or damage. I'm going with True on this one.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Danner Bank is loaning money to CareWell, so they have a direct financial interest. And since Danner Bank is the lender, they would be considered an internal user, not an external one. The answer has to be A.
SH
Shawna
1 year ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Isn't 802.1ag about continuity check and connectivity monitoring? I'm not sure how end-to-end bit error rates would fit into that.
JU
Justine
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B, but I'm also pretty sure my calculator is held together with duct tape and dreams. Fingers crossed!
ST
Stacey
1 year ago
B) 35.6% is the way to go. I mean, who doesn't love a good 35.6% revenue decrease? It's the spice of life!
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
D) $21,380 in total
ZE
Zena
1 year ago
C) $20,000 per year
CO
Coletta
1 year ago
B) 35.6%
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
A) 7.2%
MA
Mayra
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. Guess I'll go with B, since a 35.6% decrease seems more realistic than a fixed dollar amount.
DO
Dorsey
1 year ago
Bobbye: Okay, I'll go with B) 35.6% as well.
CA
Carry
1 year ago
User 3: I agree with Carry, a percentage decrease seems more realistic.
BO
Bobbye
1 year ago
User 2: I'm not sure, I'm leaning towards B) 35.6% decrease.
CA
Candida
1 year ago
User 1: I think the answer is D) $21,380 in total.
MA
Marylou
2 years ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B. It makes sense that the revenue can decrease by a significant amount before the project becomes unviable.
SK
Skye
2 years ago
But if the revenue decreases by $20,000 per year, the project may not be viable.
OZ
Ozell
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it can decrease by 7.2%.
SO
Sommer
2 years ago
The correct answer is B) 35.6%. This represents the maximum decrease in forecast revenue before the project becomes not viable, based on the given NPV calculation.
DO
Dominga
1 year ago
That's correct. The NPV calculation shows that a decrease of 35.6% in forecast revenue is the limit before the project becomes not viable.
KR
Kris
1 year ago
I think the forecast revenue can decrease by 35.6% before the project is not viable.
SK
Skye
2 years ago
I think the forecast revenue can decrease by $20,000 per year.