D) A project's MIRR will always be higher than its IRR. Well, that's convenient! I guess the finance gods decided to make MIRR the 'above-average' sibling of the IRR family.
B) MIRR favours projects with long payback periods whereas IRR does not. Interesting. I wonder if that means MIRR is better for evaluating long-term investments. Or maybe it just likes to torture project managers with endless calculations.
C) MIRR and IRR will always rank competing projects in the same order. Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. Isn't the whole point of MIRR to provide a different perspective on project ranking compared to IRR?
D) A project's MIRR will always be higher than its IRR. Really? I thought MIRR was supposed to be more conservative than IRR. Guess I need to review the differences between these two metrics.
A) MIRR uses a more realistic reinvestment assumption than IRR. This makes sense to me, as MIRR considers the actual rates at which cash flows can be reinvested, rather than just assuming a constant rate like IRR.
Hildegarde
8 days agoAnnamaria
10 days agoRossana
21 days agoMadonna
21 days agoYolando
23 days agoEdna
23 days agoRossana
24 days agoHildegarde
29 days agoDenny
5 days agoHuey
9 days agoTresa
10 days ago