Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 6 Question 51 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 51
Topic #: 6
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

YHJ is considering an investment in a project that will cost $20 million. Annual fixed costs will be $12 million per year, excluding depreciation. Annual sales are forecast at 5 million units, with a contribution per unit of $8. After five years the equipment will be worn out and YHJ will have to spend $50 million on disposal costs. The discount rate is 10%.

Calculate the sensitivity of the net present value of this project to a 20% increase in the disposal costs.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C

by Marsha at Jul 17, 2024, 11:31 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alfreda
6 months ago
Definitely not going with option A, that seems too low.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
6 months ago
Wait, $50 million for disposal? That sounds excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C, seems realistic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
7 months ago
I think a 20% increase could really hurt the NPV.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
7 months ago
The disposal costs are a huge factor here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
7 months ago
If I recall correctly, the sensitivity analysis should show how much the NPV changes with that increase in costs, but I’m not confident about the exact percentage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
7 months ago
I’m a bit confused about how to factor in the fixed costs and contribution margin when calculating the NPV.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
8 months ago
I think the key is to calculate the NPV first and then see how a 20% increase in the $50 million disposal cost affects it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
8 months ago
I remember we did a similar question on NPV sensitivity in class, but I’m not sure how to apply it here with the disposal costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
8 months ago
Okay, let's break this down step-by-step. First, I'll compute the NPV using the given information. Then I'll recalculate it with the 20% higher disposal cost and see the difference. As long as I'm careful with the math, I think I can nail this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure I fully understand all the details here. The fixed costs, contribution per unit, and discount rate - I'll need to make sure I plug those in correctly. And that disposal cost at the end, that could really impact the NPV.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
8 months ago
This question looks tricky, but I think I can handle it. I'll need to calculate the net present value of the project, then see how it changes with a 20% increase in disposal costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
8 months ago
This is a lot of information to juggle. I better re-read it a few times to make sure I have all the variables accounted for. The sensitivity analysis part is what's really throwing me off - I'll need to make sure I understand how to properly calculate that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The key is to focus on the characteristics of a buffer cache, like how it stores copies of data blocks and uses an LRU list to maintain efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
8 months ago
Ah, I see now. A view is just a virtual table, so it can't directly enforce referential integrity. I'll select "No change is needed."
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
1 year ago
I don't know about you, but I'm already dreading the disposal costs. Couldn't they just donate the equipment to a museum or something?
upvoted 0 times
Reed
12 months ago
User 4: C) 31%
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
12 months ago
User 3: A) 11%
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
12 months ago
User 2: I think it's important to consider all the costs involved in the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
12 months ago
User 3: B) 13%
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
12 months ago
User 1: I agree, those disposal costs are really high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 year ago
User 2: A) 11%
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, those disposal costs are really high.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dan
1 year ago
The disposal costs are really going to hurt the bottom line, aren't they? I wonder if they factored in the cost of hiring a professional junk removal service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I feel like I'm missing something in the calculations, but I can't put my finger on it. Guess I'll have to review the formulas again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
1 year ago
Hmm, 31% seems a bit high. I bet the answer is going to be somewhere in the teens, but I'll double-check my work just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
Malcolm
1 year ago
I agree, 31% does seem high. Let's double-check our calculations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
1 year ago
I think it's 13%
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. A 20% increase in disposal costs would be an additional $10 million, so that's definitely going to impact the NPV.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
I believe the correct answer is C) 31%, as a 20% increase in disposal costs will have a substantial effect on the project's net present value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
1 year ago
I agree, if the disposal costs increase by 20%, it will have a significant impact on the project's profitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
1 year ago
I think the sensitivity of the net present value will be affected by the increase in disposal costs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel