CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 5 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam

Question #: 15
Topic #: 5

YY is a company which generates electricity from alternative energy sources It has just begun constructing a wind farm near a well-known beauty spot The protect has been controversial as campaigners say it will be noisy and unsightly.

The campaigners took legal action but lost the case Some of them have started a campaign of direct action against YY and are physically blocking roads leading to the site and attempting to intimidate YY's staff

YY has hired a security company to help it to protect its staff

Which of the following statements are view in relation to the ethics of this scenario''

Select ALL that apply.

AYY is within its rights to hire the security firm because it has duty of care to its employees

BThe security firm must take care not to use more force against the protestors than is absolutely necessary.

CYY no longer has any duty of care to the protestors since their actions are illegal because they lost their court case

DThe generation of electricity from clean renewable and sustainable sources is too important for the protestors' concerns to be considered

ESince the protestors have already lost their court case they would no longer be ethically justified in engaging in political lobbying to try to get the government to change the law in this area

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B, D

by Deandrea at Aug 20, 2022, 01:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sharee

4 months ago

The security firm needs to be careful, no need for escalation!

upvoted 0 times

...

Xenia

4 months ago

The protestors should have a voice, even if they lost in court.

upvoted 0 times

...

Audrie

4 months ago

Wait, so they can just ignore the protestors because they lost? Seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Muriel

4 months ago

But what about the beauty spot? It’s a valid concern!

upvoted 0 times

...

Odette

4 months ago

YY has a duty of care to its employees, totally agree!

upvoted 0 times

...

Osvaldo

5 months ago

D feels a bit extreme; I think the protestors' concerns should still be taken seriously, even if renewable energy is important.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

5 months ago

B seems right to me because the security firm should use minimal force, but I wonder if there's a legal precedent for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

5 months ago

I'm not sure about C; just because the protestors lost in court doesn't mean they don't have any rights or ethical considerations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

5 months ago

I remember discussing the duty of care in class, so I think A is definitely a valid point for YY hiring security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sean

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. Myron wants to change the default password policy, so it's probably going to be in a system configuration file. I'm leaning towards D, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

5 months ago

Hmm, this one seems straightforward. I'll need to carefully read the options and think about the key features of an "Independent" value set.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aretha

5 months ago

This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty confident I know the difference between private and public keys, and how losing them affects identity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

5 months ago

Okay, let's think this through. The key is to identify the network packet loss, and the question says the Network Testing Companion is the solution. I'm confident this is the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dallas

5 months ago

I'm pretty sure this is asking about the OSHA standard that covers noise exposure in the workplace. I think the answer is Occupational Noise Exposure.

upvoted 0 times

...