Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 65 Discussion

Having carried out a full capital appraisal for a construction project, HCompanyhasapproved the project with initial outflows of $6,000,000 anda net present value of $1,200,000.The implementation phase has been commenced with 25% of the costs already committed.However whenthe ground was opened, an underground waterway was revealedwhich will need to be diverted if the project is to proceed. Work to carry out this diversion has been estimated at $1,300,000.Which of the following factors will define whether the project should go ahead or not?
A) The project actually has a higher NPV than before. and B) The project now has a negative NPV. and C) Abandoning the project will have an adverse effect on shareholder confidence.
D) There will be abandonment costs to restore the site.
E) There may be other unexpected costs to be met if the project continues.

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 4
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

Having carried out a full capital appraisal for a construction project, HCompanyhasapproved the project with initial outflows of $6,000,000 anda net present value of $1,200,000.

The implementation phase has been commenced with 25% of the costs already committed.However whenthe ground was opened, an underground waterway was revealedwhich will need to be diverted if the project is to proceed. Work to carry out this diversion has been estimated at $1,300,000.

Which of the following factors will define whether the project should go ahead or not?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C

by Edison at Feb 06, 2025, 08:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kyoko
9 months ago
Unexpected costs could really derail this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
10 months ago
Totally agree, shareholder confidence matters!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
10 months ago
Wait, how can they not see this coming?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
10 months ago
If it goes negative, that's a big red flag!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
10 months ago
The initial NPV was $1,200,000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
10 months ago
I feel like the abandonment costs mentioned in option D could be significant if they need to restore the site, but I’m not completely confident about how to quantify that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to weigh the impact on shareholder confidence, so I think option C could also be a factor to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think if the NPV turns negative, that could be a strong reason to reconsider the project, which makes option B important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anisha
11 months ago
I remember discussing how unexpected costs can really impact the overall NPV, so option E seems relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
11 months ago
This is a tough one. I'll need to carefully evaluate the revised NPV, but also consider the broader implications for the company and its stakeholders. Lots to think about here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
11 months ago
Abandoning the project could hurt shareholder confidence, so that's definitely a factor to weigh. And there may be other hidden costs if we continue, so I'll need to think through all the potential implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
11 months ago
I think the key here is to consider the factors that will determine whether the project should go ahead or not. The revised NPV is important, but there may be other strategic considerations as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
11 months ago
Okay, so the initial NPV was positive, but now we have this unexpected cost. I'm not sure if that will push the NPV into negative territory or not. I'll need to crunch the numbers to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully calculate the revised NPV after factoring in the additional $1.3 million cost to divert the waterway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 year ago
Ha! Unexpected costs? That's the story of every construction project, isn't it? The project managers must be pulling their hair out right now.
upvoted 0 times
Dean
1 year ago
Julieta: I wonder how they will decide whether to proceed or not with this new cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it's a common challenge project managers face.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, unexpected costs always seem to pop up in construction projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nan
1 year ago
The question is asking about the factors that will define whether the project should go ahead or not. I think option B is the correct answer - the negative NPV is the key factor here.
upvoted 0 times
Elena
1 year ago
So we need to consider both the negative NPV and the impact on shareholder confidence before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
1 year ago
That's a good point. Option C mentions that abandoning the project will have an adverse effect on shareholder confidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
1 year ago
But what about the impact on shareholder confidence if we abandon the project?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
I think option B is the correct answer - the negative NPV is the key factor here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. The project was initially approved, but now there's a major unexpected cost. Shareholder confidence is definitely a factor to consider.
upvoted 0 times
Carline
1 year ago
C) Abandoning the project will have an adverse effect on shareholder confidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
1 year ago
B) The project now has a negative NPV.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
1 year ago
A) The project actually has a higher NPV than before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
1 year ago
C) Abandoning the project will have an adverse effect on shareholder confidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
1 year ago
E) There may be other unexpected costs to be met if the project continues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
A) The project actually has a higher NPV than before.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
1 year ago
Hmm, the project has already incurred significant costs, but the NPV is now negative. I wonder if the additional cost of diverting the waterway will outweigh the expected benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
True, that could impact the project's NPV. We need to consider all factors before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
1 year ago
But what about the additional cost of diverting the underground waterway?
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 year ago
I think the project should still go ahead.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel