Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

T is an accountant who has been accused of professional incompetence T agreed to advise a client on currency management and the client lost a great deal of money when a large foreign currency trade receivable declined in value without having been hedged.Which of the following factors strengthens the case that T has been incompetent?Select ALL that apply
B) Since the loss the client's chief executive has spoken to her business contacts m the industry and all had hedged against a decline in this currency and C) T had studied all relevant economic forecasts and had concluded that it would be too expensive to hedge this receivable and D) T had offered the client two alternatives showing the costs and benefits of hedging the position, but did not strongly recommend either alternative
A) T had been too busy to stay up to date with continuing professional development requirements
E) T had never offered advice on foreign currency management before

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

T is an accountant who has been accused of professional incompetence T agreed to advise a client on currency management and the client lost a great deal of money when a large foreign currency trade receivable declined in value without having been hedged.

Which of the following factors strengthens the case that T has been incompetent?

Select ALL that apply

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C, D

by Angelo at Aug 05, 2024, 08:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Pearline
9 months ago
E is surprising, how did T even take this on?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
10 months ago
D is questionable, should've pushed for a recommendation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
10 months ago
C makes sense, but was it really too expensive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
10 months ago
B is a big deal, everyone else hedged!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
10 months ago
A seems pretty solid, being too busy isn't an excuse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
10 months ago
D seems important too; if T didn’t strongly recommend hedging, it might show a lack of responsibility in guiding the client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
11 months ago
I think C could actually weaken the case since T did analyze the costs, but I’m not entirely confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
11 months ago
I’m not sure about B, but it seems like if everyone else hedged, it could imply T was negligent in not advising the client to do the same.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
11 months ago
I remember discussing how staying updated with professional development is crucial for accountants, so A might strengthen the case against T.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
11 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of professional competence standards. I feel confident I can identify the factors that would support the case against the accountant. I'll methodically go through each option and select the ones that are most damaging to T's defense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. There are a lot of details to consider here. I'm not entirely sure which factors would be the strongest evidence of incompetence. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward - we just need to identify the factors that would strengthen the case that the accountant T was incompetent. I'll carefully review each option and select the ones that seem most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. The key seems to be identifying the actions or inactions by the accountant that contributed to the client's significant financial loss. I'll focus on finding the options that most clearly demonstrate T's failure to properly advise the client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we can use the switch_to class to interact with dropdown elements, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here. Maybe I should review the WebDriver documentation again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
1 year ago
I'm just gonna throw this out there - maybe T was too busy playing Fortnite to worry about that pesky 'continuing professional development' stuff. Jokes aside, B and D are the real killers here. Sounds like T needs to brush up on their currency management skills. Or maybe just stick to balancing the books.
upvoted 0 times
Shizue
1 year ago
D) T had offered the client two alternatives showing the costs and benefits of hedging the position, but did not strongly recommend either alternative
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 year ago
B) Since the loss the client's chief executive has spoken to her business contacts in the industry and all had hedged against a decline in this currency
upvoted 0 times
...
Veda
1 year ago
A) T had been too busy to stay up to date with continuing professional development requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about C. If T had done their due diligence and determined hedging was too expensive, that could be a valid defense. But B and D definitely make T look incompetent. Reminds me of the old saying, 'An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of currency losses.'
upvoted 0 times
Willow
1 year ago
E) T had never offered advice on foreign currency management before
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 year ago
C) T had studied all relevant economic forecasts and had concluded that it would be too expensive to hedge this receivable
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
A) T had been too busy to stay up to date with continuing professional development requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daron
1 year ago
I agree, B and D are the key factors here. Not staying up to date with CPD requirements (A) is bad, but the real nail in the coffin is the client's competitors successfully hedging. T really dropped the ball on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Karrie
1 year ago
D) T had offered the client two alternatives showing the costs and benefits of hedging the position, but did not strongly recommend either alternative
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
1 year ago
B) Since the loss the client's chief executive has spoken to her business contacts in the industry and all had hedged against a decline in this currency
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Helaine
1 year ago
Wow, this is a tough one. I think options B and D are the biggest red flags here. If the client's competitors all hedged successfully, that really highlights T's incompetence. And not strongly recommending either option? Yikes, that's pretty damning.
upvoted 0 times
Lavina
1 year ago
T really should have provided a clear recommendation for the client's best interest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 year ago
And option D is also concerning, not strongly recommending either option is a big issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
1 year ago
Yeah, it's a major red flag that the client's competitors all hedged successfully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
1 year ago
I agree, option B definitely shows T's incompetence.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sonia
1 year ago
I see your points, but I think factor E also plays a role in determining T's incompetence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe factors C and D are more relevant in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
1 year ago
I think factors A and B strengthen the case against T.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel