New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 4
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

The Board of Directors of VCX, a state-owned electricity company, includes four executive directors the Chief Executive Officer, the Finance Director the Operation Director and the Technical Director

All of the shares in the company vest in the Office of the Minister for Energy, who is entitled to appoint two non-executive directors to the Board It has been alleged that the Minister appoints political "insiders" who have no particular knowledge of. or interest in. the electricity industry

There are three further non-executive directors

* L, who spent seven years as Chief Executive of VCX, but retired from that role two years ago,

* M, who spent several years on the Board of a state electricity company in a different country to VCX but who resigned from it before accepting the position with VCX: and

* N, who is a qualified and experienced professional accountant

In relation to best practice in respect of Corporate Governance, which of the following statements are valid? Select ALL that apply

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Casie
4 months ago
Not sure if the Finance Director should be on the Audit Committee... seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
4 months ago
M and N are good for the Audit Committee, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
4 months ago
Wait, how can L be independent after being CEO?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
4 months ago
Totally agree, that makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
4 months ago
I think none of the execs should be on the Remuneration Committee.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
5 months ago
I feel confident that N is suitable for the Audit Committee because of his accounting background, but I’m unsure about M's suitability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
5 months ago
I practiced a question like this where we debated L's independence. I think he might not be considered independent since he was CEO recently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
5 months ago
I'm not sure about M's situation; I thought previous roles in similar companies could be a conflict, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
5 months ago
I remember discussing that executive directors shouldn't be on the Remuneration Committee to avoid conflicts of interest, so I think A might be valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
5 months ago
Whoa, this is a tough one. I'm going to need to review my notes on Real-Time ADDM and performance monitoring to figure out the right answer. Gotta be careful here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to identify the factors that are most essential for a successful CSM suite implementation. I'll go with the ones that seem to address the core business needs and implementation challenges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
5 months ago
For not-covered under Gratuity Act, the exemption logic might differ—double-check the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel