Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

JNH is a major corporation that stores its customer database in the Cloud JNH has suffered a data breach that has led to customer credit card details being made available for sale on the internet JNH's Head of Security wishes to analyse network traffic at the cloud-based server in order to gain a better understanding of the manner in which the data was intercepted, but has been refused access.

Which of the following is the most likely explanation for the third-party owner's refusal to assist JNH's Head of Security?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, F

by Tijuana at Mar 05, 2025, 08:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Glory
4 months ago
Isn't it weird that they won't help JNH analyze the traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
5 months ago
I think admitting the breach would definitely hurt their reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
5 months ago
Wait, how can they be sure the breach wasn't from their end?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
5 months ago
Totally agree, they can't just let anyone access that info!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
5 months ago
The server will contain data belonging to other clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
6 months ago
I wonder if the refusal is more about reputation. I mean, admitting a breach could really damage the cloud provider's image, so option D might be a possibility too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
6 months ago
I feel like I saw a similar question about data ownership in cloud environments. Maybe the refusal is because the network data isn't stored by the server's owner, which could relate to option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option C makes sense because if they let JNH access the data, it could expose other customers' information too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
6 months ago
I remember studying about shared responsibility models in cloud security, so I think the third-party might be worried about other clients' data being involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
6 months ago
Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud - that's a good point. The owner may be trying to cover that up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
6 months ago
The server containing data belonging to other clients makes a lot of sense. The owner likely doesn't want to expose that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
6 months ago
The network data not being stored by the server owner is an interesting possibility. I'll need to consider that angle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
6 months ago
The Cloud being "impregnable" is probably not the real reason. That's just an excuse - the data breach happened, so there must be more to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the potential reasons the third-party owner might refuse access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
The cloud provider is probably like 'we don't see any data breaches here, just a bunch of fluffy clouds.'
upvoted 0 times
Carol
10 months ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
10 months ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
10 months ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
11 months ago
Maybe the cloud provider is just 'clouding' the issue. Get it? Clouding? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Lyda
10 months ago
D) Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
10 months ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
10 months ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
10 months ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marvel
11 months ago
I bet the cloud provider is like 'what happens in the cloud, stays in the cloud.' Not very helpful, is it?
upvoted 0 times
Jennie
10 months ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
11 months ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
11 months ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Orville
12 months ago
D is the answer. The cloud provider doesn't want to admit they had a security breach and tarnish their reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
12 months ago
Option C seems the most likely. The server probably contains data from other clients, and the owner wouldn't want to compromise their privacy.
upvoted 0 times
Twanna
10 months ago
D) Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
11 months ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
11 months ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
11 months ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carisa
1 year ago
But what about option D? Could it be that admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 year ago
That makes sense. They wouldn't want to risk exposing other clients' data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
1 year ago
I think the server owner refused access because the data may belong to other clients.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel