MENU
JNH is a major corporation that stores its customer database in the Cloud JNH has suffered a data breach that has led to customer credit card details being made available for sale on the internet JNH's Head of Security wishes to analyse network traffic at the cloud-based server in order to gain a better understanding of the manner in which the data was intercepted, but has been refused access.
Which of the following is the most likely explanation for the third-party owner's refusal to assist JNH's Head of Security?
Suggested Answer: C, D, F
Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
GL
Glory
11 months ago
Isn't it weird that they won't help JNH analyze the traffic?
PA
Paola
11 months ago
I think admitting the breach would definitely hurt their reputation.
RE
Remona
11 months ago
Wait, how can they be sure the breach wasn't from their end?
CH
Chantay
12 months ago
Totally agree, they can't just let anyone access that info!
PH
Phuong
12 months ago
The server will contain data belonging to other clients.
GI
Gilma
12 months ago
I wonder if the refusal is more about reputation. I mean, admitting a breach could really damage the cloud provider's image, so option D might be a possibility too.
DE
Detra
1 year ago
I feel like I saw a similar question about data ownership in cloud environments. Maybe the refusal is because the network data isn't stored by the server's owner, which could relate to option B.
BE
Beatriz
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option C makes sense because if they let JNH access the data, it could expose other customers' information too.
JO
Joni
1 year ago
I remember studying about shared responsibility models in cloud security, so I think the third-party might be worried about other clients' data being involved.
CH
Cherry
1 year ago
Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud - that's a good point. The owner may be trying to cover that up.
AS
Asha
1 year ago
The server containing data belonging to other clients makes a lot of sense. The owner likely doesn't want to expose that.
GE
Gertude
1 year ago
The network data not being stored by the server owner is an interesting possibility. I'll need to consider that angle.
BR
Brent
1 year ago
The Cloud being "impregnable" is probably not the real reason. That's just an excuse - the data breach happened, so there must be more to it.
AI
Aimee
1 year ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the potential reasons the third-party owner might refuse access.
FE
Felix
1 year ago
The cloud provider is probably like 'we don't see any data breaches here, just a bunch of fluffy clouds.'
CA
Carol
1 year ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
AN
Annmarie
1 year ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
TR
Trevor
1 year ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
Maybe the cloud provider is just 'clouding' the issue. Get it? Clouding? *chuckles*
LY
Lyda
1 year ago
D) Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud
CA
Catarina
1 year ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
BU
Buddy
1 year ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
EV
Eveline
1 year ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
MA
Marvel
1 year ago
I bet the cloud provider is like 'what happens in the cloud, stays in the cloud.' Not very helpful, is it?
JE
Jennie
1 year ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
AL
Albert
1 year ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
LE
Leonardo
1 year ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
OR
Orville
2 years ago
D is the answer. The cloud provider doesn't want to admit they had a security breach and tarnish their reputation.
OR
Oretha
2 years ago
Option C seems the most likely. The server probably contains data from other clients, and the owner wouldn't want to compromise their privacy.
TW
Twanna
1 year ago
D) Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud
DO
Doug
1 year ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
SH
Shawn
1 year ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
PA
Pamella
1 year ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
CA
Carisa
2 years ago
But what about option D? Could it be that admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud?
LY
Lynelle
2 years ago
That makes sense. They wouldn't want to risk exposing other clients' data.
AS
Ashanti
2 years ago
I think the server owner refused access because the data may belong to other clients.