Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 66 Discussion

JNH is a major corporation that stores its customer database in the Cloud JNH has suffered a data breach that has led to customer credit card details being made available for sale on the internet JNH's Head of Security wishes to analyse network traffic at the cloud-based server in order to gain a better understanding of the manner in which the data was intercepted, but has been refused access.Which of the following is the most likely explanation for the third-party owner's refusal to assist JNH's Head of Security?
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients and D) Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

JNH is a major corporation that stores its customer database in the Cloud JNH has suffered a data breach that has led to customer credit card details being made available for sale on the internet JNH's Head of Security wishes to analyse network traffic at the cloud-based server in order to gain a better understanding of the manner in which the data was intercepted, but has been refused access.

Which of the following is the most likely explanation for the third-party owner's refusal to assist JNH's Head of Security?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D, F

by Tijuana at Mar 05, 2025, 08:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Glory
8 months ago
Isn't it weird that they won't help JNH analyze the traffic?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
8 months ago
I think admitting the breach would definitely hurt their reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Remona
8 months ago
Wait, how can they be sure the breach wasn't from their end?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
8 months ago
Totally agree, they can't just let anyone access that info!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
9 months ago
The server will contain data belonging to other clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
9 months ago
I wonder if the refusal is more about reputation. I mean, admitting a breach could really damage the cloud provider's image, so option D might be a possibility too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
9 months ago
I feel like I saw a similar question about data ownership in cloud environments. Maybe the refusal is because the network data isn't stored by the server's owner, which could relate to option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option C makes sense because if they let JNH access the data, it could expose other customers' information too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
9 months ago
I remember studying about shared responsibility models in cloud security, so I think the third-party might be worried about other clients' data being involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
9 months ago
Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud - that's a good point. The owner may be trying to cover that up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
9 months ago
The server containing data belonging to other clients makes a lot of sense. The owner likely doesn't want to expose that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
9 months ago
The network data not being stored by the server owner is an interesting possibility. I'll need to consider that angle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
9 months ago
The Cloud being "impregnable" is probably not the real reason. That's just an excuse - the data breach happened, so there must be more to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
10 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the potential reasons the third-party owner might refuse access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 year ago
The cloud provider is probably like 'we don't see any data breaches here, just a bunch of fluffy clouds.'
upvoted 0 times
Carol
1 year ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
1 year ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
1 year ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
Maybe the cloud provider is just 'clouding' the issue. Get it? Clouding? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Lyda
1 year ago
D) Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 year ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
1 year ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
1 year ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marvel
1 year ago
I bet the cloud provider is like 'what happens in the cloud, stays in the cloud.' Not very helpful, is it?
upvoted 0 times
Jennie
1 year ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
1 year ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
1 year ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Orville
1 year ago
D is the answer. The cloud provider doesn't want to admit they had a security breach and tarnish their reputation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
1 year ago
Option C seems the most likely. The server probably contains data from other clients, and the owner wouldn't want to compromise their privacy.
upvoted 0 times
Twanna
1 year ago
D) Admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
1 year ago
C) The server will contain data belonging to other clients
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
1 year ago
B) The network data will not have been stored by the server's owner
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 year ago
A) The Cloud is impregnable and so the breach must have been elsewhere
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carisa
1 year ago
But what about option D? Could it be that admitting the breach would harm the reputation of the Cloud?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
1 year ago
That makes sense. They wouldn't want to risk exposing other clients' data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
1 year ago
I think the server owner refused access because the data may belong to other clients.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel