Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-P03-1 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA19-P03-1 Questions]

YGH has recently completed a post completion audit on a five year contract that has only recently come to a conclusion. The main finding was that the project delivered most of the expected benefits, but that it cost significantly more to implement than had been anticipated at the project appraisal stage. YGH would not have proceeded if the true cost had been known at that stage.

The project was the responsibility of the production department, which is presently managed by G.

When the project was proposed, the production department was managed by H. H is now YGH's Director of Operations.

How should the finding from this post completion audit be interpreted?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, E, F

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Felice
4 months ago
Not sure if cutting funding for G's department is the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
5 months ago
Agree, more detailed assumptions would help avoid surprises like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
5 months ago
Wait, why is H being considered for accountability? He’s not in charge anymore!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
5 months ago
I think G should be held accountable for the overspend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
5 months ago
YGH definitely needs better cost checks for future projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
6 months ago
I lean towards option B because if the production department overspent, they might need stricter funding criteria moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
6 months ago
I feel like option D could be valid since H was in charge during the proposal phase, but I'm not confident about how much blame should be assigned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
6 months ago
I remember a similar question where accountability was a big theme. I wonder if option C is the right choice here, but G was only managing the project at the end.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option A makes sense since it emphasizes improving future project assessments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
6 months ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I should focus more on the cost overrun, the change in management, or some combination of factors. I'll need to carefully weigh the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
6 months ago
This question is testing our ability to apply our knowledge of project management and accountability. I feel confident I can work through the details and identify the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. I'll focus on analyzing the key facts, like the change in project management, and then try to determine the most appropriate recommendation based on that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about how to interpret the findings. I'll need to re-read the question and think through the different options before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rueben
6 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the details about the project, the management changes, and the potential implications for accountability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
6 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking where the administrator should check, so I'll need to consider the different tabs and pages in Calm and Prism Central.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
6 months ago
I thought control connections were handled by BGP, but now I'm wondering if that's just for traditional routing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
6 months ago
I remember studying that EDR is more focused on advanced threat detection, but I'm a bit fuzzy on when exactly to choose it over an EPP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
11 months ago
Wait, did they try turning the project off and on again? That usually fixes everything in the IT world!
upvoted 0 times
Raelene
10 months ago
C) G should be held accountable for the overspend on the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
11 months ago
B) The production department should not be granted funding for future projects unless there are compelling reasons to proceed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
11 months ago
A) YGH should consider introducing more detailed checking of the assumptions underlying the costs of future projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rasheeda
11 months ago
This is like a game of 'hot potato' - nobody wants to take the blame! I'll go with A, but I'm not sure any of these options are completely satisfactory.
upvoted 0 times
Donette
11 months ago
C) G should be held accountable for the overspend on the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
11 months ago
B) The production department should not be granted funding for future projects unless there are compelling reasons to proceed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
11 months ago
A) YGH should consider introducing more detailed checking of the assumptions underlying the costs of future projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonja
11 months ago
Hold on, wait a minute. Didn't the question say H was the one in charge when the project was proposed? Shouldn't he be the one held accountable? I'm going with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
12 months ago
I'm not sure I agree with that. If the true costs were hidden, then the production department is to blame. I'd go with C - G should be held responsible.
upvoted 0 times
Asha
10 months ago
That's a good point. So maybe both G and H should share the responsibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
10 months ago
True, but G was the one managing the department when the project was actually implemented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
11 months ago
But H was the one managing the department when the project was proposed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
11 months ago
I think G should definitely be held accountable for the overspend.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cory
12 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think the answer is A - YGH should really tighten up their cost estimation process. Sounds like they got burned on this one!
upvoted 0 times
Tonette
11 months ago
Yeah, it's important to avoid overspending like in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
11 months ago
I agree, better cost estimation is key for future projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ngoc
1 year ago
But shouldn't G be held accountable for the overspend since he was the manager at the time?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 year ago
I agree with Madonna. It's important to avoid overspending on projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
1 year ago
I think YGH should consider introducing more detailed checking of the assumptions for future projects.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel