B seems like the most logical choice to me. The employer has to step in if the funds are insufficient. I'd rather not depend on the whims of the stock market, thank you very much.
B) The employer would make additional contributions into the scheme if the actuary predicted a shortfall in the funds available to pay post-employment benefits.
Ha! D is clearly the funniest option. The employer can just take a 'contributions holiday' if the assets are sufficient. Like a paid vacation, but for the company!
I think the correct answer is A) The amount of the post-employment benefits paid to former employees depends on how well the scheme's investments have performed.
I think the correct answer is A) The amount of the post-employment benefits paid to former employees depends on how well the scheme's investments have performed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Loise
1 months agoTenesha
21 days agoRashad
22 days agoPatria
1 months agoAvery
1 months agoRyann
1 months agoPete
1 months agoRyann
1 months agoCharlene
2 months agoJamal
27 days agoDenny
29 days agoGerald
2 months agoJamey
Tonja
21 hours agoLuis
2 days agoLouvenia
4 days agoGerald
5 days agoHoa
9 days agoGwenn
28 days ago