MENU
GCompany hasrecently undergone a series of redundancies meaning that, in the near future, opportunities for promotion of remaining staff are likely to be limited. If the company wishesto keep staff motivated, whichof the following techniques should NOT be used?
Suggested Answer: A, B, C
Get Premium CIMAPRA19-E01-1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
27 comments · newest first
BI
Billy
11 months ago
I think job enlargement might just overwhelm the remaining staff.
HI
Hildred
11 months ago
Job rotation could actually keep things interesting, right?
MA
Mattie
11 months ago
Wait, are we really saying job enrichment is a no-go? That sounds off.
AL
Almeta
12 months ago
Totally agree, it would just make things more monotonous.
CH
Chara
12 months ago
Job standardisation seems like a bad idea right now.
HE
Herminia
1 year ago
I have a vague memory that job enlargement could also lead to burnout, so maybe that one isn't ideal for motivation either?
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
We practiced a similar question about motivation techniques, and I think job rotation was seen as a positive way to keep things interesting.
DI
Dino
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like job standardisation might not be the best choice here since it could limit creativity.
GA
Gabriele
1 year ago
I remember discussing job enrichment and how it can actually motivate employees, so I think that one should be safe.
LU
Luis
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. If the company wants to keep staff motivated with limited promotions, they should avoid techniques that reduce job variety and challenge. Job standardization seems like the way to go here.
CE
Ceola
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know job enrichment and job enlargement are ways to motivate employees, but I'm not sure about the differences between them. I'll have to think this through carefully.
GL
Glenn
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about motivational techniques. I'll start by considering which of the options would be least effective in keeping staff motivated if there are limited promotion opportunities.
TH
Theresia
1 year ago
Job standardization? Really? That seems like the obvious answer to me. Standardizing jobs would reduce autonomy and opportunities for growth, which is the opposite of what the company needs to keep people motivated.
JO
Joana
1 year ago
Well, if they're going for the 'less is more' approach, job standardization is the way to go. Might as well make it as painless as possible, right?
AN
Annamae
1 year ago
Job enrichment is the way to go, folks. Give them more responsibilities and challenges to keep them engaged. Just don't overdo it, or they might start looking for an escape hatch.
CA
Carylon
1 year ago
D) Job enlargement
CH
Christiane
1 year ago
C) Job standardisation
VA
Val
1 year ago
B) Job rotation
LA
Lavonda
1 year ago
A) Job enrichment
NA
Nan
1 year ago
Job rotation could be a real winner here. Just don't send them on a merry-go-round to nowhere, you know?
JO
Jonell
1 year ago
C) Job standardisation
CO
Corrie
1 year ago
B) Job rotation
LO
Lottie
1 year ago
A) Job enrichment
JI
Jina
2 years ago
Hmm, job standardization? Sounds like a recipe for boredom and demotivation. Better keep those employees on their toes!
BE
Bernadine
2 years ago
I disagree. Job standardisation can actually help maintain consistency and efficiency in the company.
AL
Alverta
2 years ago
I agree with Sophia. Job standardisation may make employees feel like they are just a number.
SO
Sophia
2 years ago
I think job standardisation should not be used.