MENU
Z Ltd intends to participate in a "substantial property transaction" with one of its directors. Which of the following is correct in relation to substantial property transactions?
(i) The value of the asset must exceed 10% of the company's net assets and be more than 5,000.
(ii) The transaction must be approved by the shareholders.
(iii) The director must disclose his interest in the transaction.
Suggested Answer: A, B, C
Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
40 comments · newest first
DE
Desmond
11 months ago
Just to clarify, the minimum value is 5,000, right?
MI
Michel
11 months ago
I think all three points are important for transparency.
JU
Junita
11 months ago
Wait, does the director really have to disclose their interest? Seems sketchy.
VO
Vonda
12 months ago
Totally agree, shareholders need to approve these transactions.
IS
Isreal
12 months ago
The asset value must exceed 10% of net assets, that's a key point!
VA
Valentin
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards option D because it seems like all three points are important for compliance, but I’m a bit uncertain about the exact thresholds.
TE
Teri
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where the director's disclosure was emphasized, so I feel like (iii) is definitely correct.
BI
Billy
1 year ago
I think (ii) and (iii) are definitely required, but I can't recall if (i) is also a must.
QU
Quinn
1 year ago
I remember something about substantial property transactions needing shareholder approval, but I'm not sure if all three points are necessary.
MA
Man
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not 100% sure I fully grasp all the nuances of the legal requirements for a "substantial property transaction." I'll need to re-read the question carefully and maybe even jot down some notes to work through it.
IR
Irma
1 year ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the legal requirements, so I'll focus on analyzing each of the answer choices to determine which one matches the criteria.
MI
Mickie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully review the details of the question and the answer options to make sure I understand the specific criteria.
EL
Elouise
1 year ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the key is to identify the correct legal requirements for a "substantial property transaction" involving a director.
AN
Anissa
1 year ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The wording of the question and the answer choices seems clear, so I think I can eliminate the incorrect options and select the right answer.
TO
Tomoko
1 year ago
Wait, does that mean the requirements are always the criteria, or only if the product is to be purchased? I'm a bit confused on the nuance here.
EM
Emily
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about a feature or tool in the system. I'll read through the options carefully and try to identify the one that best matches the description of "Setup Assistant".
BE
Benedict
1 year ago
I might go with option B because it feels right, but I wish I could remember the exact steps we talked about in class!
RE
Rex
1 year ago
I'm just here for the free snacks during the break. Substantial property transactions? More like substantial confusion if you ask me!
MA
Malinda
1 year ago
I agree, it can be confusing. But it's important to follow the rules to avoid any issues.
LA
Lacey
1 year ago
I'm glad I'm not the only one confused about this. But at least we get free snacks!
DO
Dominic
1 year ago
C) (i) and (iii) only
RA
Rashida
1 year ago
Yes, that's correct. It's one of the requirements for substantial property transactions.
SH
Sheridan
1 year ago
A) (i) only
CI
Ciara
1 year ago
I think the director has to disclose his interest in the transaction.
ME
Melinda
1 year ago
B has got to be the way to go. I mean, who cares about the director's interest, right? As long as the numbers check out and the shareholders approve, it's all good. What could possibly go wrong?
KE
Kenneth
1 year ago
C) (i) and (iii) only
IL
Ilene
1 year ago
B) (i) and (ii) only
PE
Pete
1 year ago
A) (i) only
ME
Merissa
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm going with C. The value threshold and director disclosure are important, but maybe the shareholders don't need to be involved if it's a small-ish transaction, you know? Gotta keep those board meetings short and sweet!
PA
Paola
2 years ago
Easy peasy, it's D! A director can't just go around making big deals without shareholder approval and disclosing their interest. That's like the corporate version of a magic trick - everyone would see right through it!
TE
Tequila
1 year ago
So, it's not just about the director's personal interests, but also about the company's overall well-being.
CL
Clorinda
1 year ago
Exactly, shareholders have a right to know and approve of major deals involving directors.
PE
Peter
1 year ago
Yeah, it's important for transparency and to protect the interests of the company and shareholders.
CR
Craig
1 year ago
I think it's D too. Directors need to follow the rules when it comes to big transactions.
AN
Annmarie
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's important for the director to disclose their interest in the transaction to avoid any conflicts of interest.
SH
Sherly
2 years ago
I think the correct answer is (i), (ii) and (iii). All three conditions must be met for a substantial property transaction with a director.
NA
Nakisha
1 year ago
Yes, the value of the asset must exceed 10% of the company's net assets, be more than 5,000, approved by shareholders, and the director must disclose his interest.
CH
Chandra
1 year ago
I agree, all three conditions must be met for a substantial property transaction.
MA
Marget
2 years ago
I agree with Earlean, it makes sense that all conditions need to be fulfilled to ensure transparency and fairness.
EA
Earlean
2 years ago
I think the answer is D, because all three conditions must be met for a substantial property transaction.