Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 7 Question 105 Discussion

Exe Ltd includes the following provisions in its Articles of Association. If Exe Ltd acted in breach of these clauses, identify which would not be enforceable against the company as a breach of contract.
B) All shareholders are entitled to attend and vote at general meetings of the company.
A) Shareholders shall be paid dividends in cash.
C) Tom (a shareholder) shall be the company's managing director for life.
D) Shareholders wishing to sell their shares shall offer them to the company which will purchase them at a fair price as determined by the auditors.

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 7 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 7
[All CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions]

Exe Ltd includes the following provisions in its Articles of Association. If Exe Ltd acted in breach of these clauses, identify which would not be enforceable against the company as a breach of contract.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ryan
8 months ago
D is interesting, but how do you determine a "fair price"?
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
8 months ago
A sounds solid, but B is just standard practice, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
8 months ago
Wait, are you sure about C? Seems a bit harsh to just dismiss it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
8 months ago
I agree, C is a no-go. Can't tie someone down like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
9 months ago
C is definitely not enforceable. Lifelong contracts are tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
9 months ago
The clause about selling shares seems tricky too. I recall a practice question where the company had to follow specific procedures for share buybacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
9 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like the dividend payment clause could be enforceable since it relates to shareholder rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
9 months ago
I think the clause about Tom being the managing director for life could be problematic. It seems too absolute and might not hold up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
9 months ago
I remember discussing how certain provisions might not be enforceable, especially if they conflict with company law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
9 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to be really careful in my analysis to make sure I don't overlook any important details. Gotta stay focused and not get tripped up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
9 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. First, I need to identify the key legal principles around the enforceability of articles of association clauses. Then I can apply those to each of the provisions given in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the relevant laws and principles around the enforceability of articles of association provisions. Gotta make sure I don't miss anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it. I'll need to analyze each provision and determine which one would not be enforceable against the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
1 year ago
Clause B about shareholder voting rights sounds pretty standard, but Clause C is just asking for trouble. The company will be stuck with Tom whether he's good or not.
upvoted 0 times
Billi
1 year ago
Yeah, having a clause like that could really limit the company's options in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
1 year ago
I agree, but Clause C seems risky. What if Tom is not a good managing director?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
1 year ago
Clause B is definitely important for shareholder participation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reuben
1 year ago
Haha, can you imagine Tom as the company's MD for life? I bet he's already planning his retirement villa on a private island.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 year ago
Clause A about paying dividends in cash is reasonable, but Clause C is just absurd. The company can't be bound to a managing director for life!
upvoted 0 times
Annmarie
1 year ago
D) Shareholders wishing to sell their shares shall offer them to the company which will purchase them at a fair price as determined by the auditors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
1 year ago
B) All shareholders are entitled to attend and vote at general meetings of the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jame
1 year ago
D) Shareholders wishing to sell their shares shall offer them to the company which will purchase them at a fair price as determined by the auditors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
B) All shareholders are entitled to attend and vote at general meetings of the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
1 year ago
A) Shareholders shall be paid dividends in cash.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 year ago
A) Shareholders shall be paid dividends in cash.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Della
1 year ago
I think Clause D could also be unenforceable. Forcing shareholders to sell their shares to the company at a price determined by the auditors seems too restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 year ago
But what about clause D? It also seems restrictive for shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rozella
1 year ago
I agree with Joseph. Having Tom as managing director for life seems unreasonable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
1 year ago
Clause C is definitely not enforceable. Appointing a managing director for life is an unreasonable restriction on the company's management.
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
1 year ago
I think clause D would also not be enforceable because it restricts shareholders' ability to sell their shares freely.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joseph
1 year ago
I think clause C would not be enforceable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel