New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 4 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 4
[All CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions]

Which of the following is INCORRECT in relation to directors' duties?

i. Directors who arrange for shares to be offered directly to their supporters in order to prevent a take-over bid are acting lawfully so long as they have the legal power to allot shares in the company's constitution.

ii. Directors may act in breach of their duties and still be complying with the UK Corporate Governance Code.

iii. Directors' duties are owed to the shareholders as a body and enforceable by the company.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Gerald
3 months ago
Sounds fishy, how can they act unlawfully and still be compliant?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
3 months ago
I thought directors had to prioritize shareholder interests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
4 months ago
Wait, can they really breach duties and still follow the Code?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
4 months ago
Totally agree, that's how it works!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
4 months ago
Directors can legally allot shares if allowed by the company's constitution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question before, and I think (i) is the one that could be incorrect. It just feels off to me, but I can't pinpoint why.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
4 months ago
I feel like (iii) is definitely true since directors owe their duties to the shareholders, but I can't recall if it's enforceable by the company itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
5 months ago
I think (ii) might be the tricky one here. We talked about how compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code doesn't always mean they're acting within their duties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
I remember discussing directors' duties in class, but I'm not entirely sure if (i) is correct or not. It seems like it could be lawful if they have the power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
5 months ago
This is a good test of my knowledge on directors' duties. I'll need to apply the legal principles carefully to identify the incorrect statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
5 months ago
The key here is understanding the relationship between directors' duties and the UK Corporate Governance Code. I'll need to think about how those two elements interact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. Let me walk through the options and see if I can spot the incorrect one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
5 months ago
Hmm, the wording on these options is tricky. I'll need to carefully analyze each one to determine which is incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the nuances of directors' duties before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
5 months ago
The key here is understanding the difference between the legal requirements and the governance code. I think the second statement is the one that's incorrect, since directors can breach their duties even if they're complying with the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
5 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Aren't directors' duties always owed to the shareholders? I'm not sure about that second statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merrilee
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. I think the answer is (ii) and (iii) only, since directors can breach their duties even if they're following the governance code, and their duties are owed to the company, not just the shareholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The first statement seems a bit iffy, but I'm not totally sure. The second one is the one that's really got me stumped.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlie
5 months ago
Hmm, this question seems tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the key principles of directors' duties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. The question mentions a large amount of historical data, so I'm thinking the SOAP API or an AppExchange package might be better options to consider. I'll need to review the differences between the choices more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
5 months ago
The question about the data center location is a good catch. I think that's a key factor in determining their GDPR compliance requirements. I'll make sure to consider that carefully in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
5 months ago
This seems like a pretty standard repository management question. I think the key is using the repos.py command with the right options. I'll make sure to read through the answer choices carefully and select the correct steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about (ii) and (iii). The governance code and shareholder duties can be a bit of a minefield. Better double-check my notes before answering this one.
upvoted 0 times
Kati
8 months ago
User 3: Yeah, (ii) doesn't sound right. Better make sure before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
9 months ago
User 2: I agree, (ii) seems off. They have to follow their duties and the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
9 months ago
User 1: I think (ii) is incorrect, directors can't breach their duties and still comply with the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elenore
10 months ago
Haha, this question is a real test of whether you've been paying attention in your corporate law classes. I'd say (ii) and (iii) are the tricky ones - gotta keep those directors on their toes!
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
9 months ago
D) (ii) and (iii) only
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
9 months ago
C) (ii) only
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
9 months ago
B) (i) and (ii) only
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
A) (i) only
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aja
10 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. But I still think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is correct because directors can still breach their duties while following the UK Corporate Governance Code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
11 months ago
I agree, (i) is the wrong answer here. Trying to entrench your position as a director by manipulating the share structure is a big no-no.
upvoted 0 times
Octavio
9 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aja
11 months ago
I think option A is correct because directors can allot shares if they have the legal power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
11 months ago
Option (i) is clearly incorrect. Arranging a share issue to prevent a takeover is a classic example of directors acting in their own interests rather than the company's. That's a breach of their duties.
upvoted 0 times
Renea
9 months ago
Directors may act in breach of their duties and still be complying with the UK Corporate Governance Code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
9 months ago
C) (ii) only
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
10 months ago
Option (i) is clearly incorrect. Arranging a share issue to prevent a takeover is a classic example of directors acting in their own interests rather than the company's. That's a breach of their duties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
10 months ago
A) (i) only
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel