New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 3
[All CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions]

Which of the following is correct in relation to international relations?

(i) International regulations are voluntarily entered into by commercial and professional bodies to standardize practices and procedure to make it easier to enter into international trading agreements.

(ii) International regulations which have been agreed by the professional bodies of different states are only binding on the members of those bodies or those who choose to adopt them.

(iii) International regulations may attain the force of law by being adopted by the legislatures of individual states

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lashandra
3 months ago
(iii) is a big deal, it’s how international rules become law!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
3 months ago
Totally agree, (i) and (ii) make sense together!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
3 months ago
Wait, are you saying (i) is just voluntary? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
4 months ago
I think (iii) is also true, laws can change with state adoption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
4 months ago
(ii) is correct, only binding for those who adopt them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
I lean towards (D) because it seems like all three statements could be true in different contexts, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify binding agreements, and I feel like (ii) might be misleading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tambra
4 months ago
I think (iii) is definitely correct because regulations can become law when states adopt them, but I'm a bit confused about (ii).
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
I remember discussing how international regulations can sometimes be voluntary, but I'm not sure if that applies to all cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on the specifics of how international regulations work. I'll need to review my notes before attempting this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
5 months ago
(iii) seems like the key to this question. If international regulations can become legally binding, that's an important distinction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. I need to understand the nuances between the three statements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between voluntary and binding international regulations. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
9 months ago
Option (iii) is the way to go. You know, the whole idea of international regulations reminds me of that old saying, 'herding cats.' It's like trying to get a bunch of countries to agree on anything – good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
9 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I was going to go with (i) and (ii), but I suppose (iii) covers all the bases. Although, I have to say, the idea of international regulators as a bunch of bureaucrats in fancy suits trying to herd cats is kind of amusing.
upvoted 0 times
Bonita
8 months ago
Haha, yeah, trying to herd cats sounds like a tough job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
8 months ago
Haha, the image of bureaucrats herding cats is quite amusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
8 months ago
It's interesting to think about international regulators as bureaucrats in fancy suits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
9 months ago
I agree, international regulations can become law if adopted by individual states.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
9 months ago
I agree, international regulations can become law if adopted by individual states.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
9 months ago
I think (iii) covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
9 months ago
I think (iii) covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keith
10 months ago
I was leaning towards (i) and (ii), but you're right, (iii) is the most comprehensive answer. International bodies can set standards, but they only have teeth once governments make them law.
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
9 months ago
Agreed, (i) and (ii) are important steps, but (iii) is what gives international regulations real power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
9 months ago
It's important to remember that international regulations need to be adopted by individual states to have legal force.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
9 months ago
Yes, (iii) shows the full picture of how international regulations become binding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alison
10 months ago
I was also considering (i) and (ii), but (iii) does make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lajuana
10 months ago
Option (iii) seems to be the clear winner here. International regulations only become legally binding once they are adopted by individual states. The other options are too limited in their scope.
upvoted 0 times
Sherill
9 months ago
Yes, international regulations need to be adopted by individual states to have legal force.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
10 months ago
I agree, option (iii) is the most comprehensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gary
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's important for international regulations to be binding on all members to ensure consistency in practices
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
11 months ago
I agree with Bernardo, because international regulations can become law if adopted by individual states
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is D) (i), (ii) and (iii)
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel