Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 3 Question 106 Discussion

Posted by Otis on Jan 25, 2025 at 02:26 PM

Which of the following is correct in relation to international relations?

(i) International regulations are voluntarily entered into by commercial and professional bodies to standardize practices and procedure to make it easier to enter into international trading agreements.

(ii) International regulations which have been agreed by the professional bodies of different states are only binding on the members of those bodies or those who choose to adopt them.

(iii) International regulations may attain the force of law by being adopted by the legislatures of individual states

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
LA
Lashandra 11 months ago
(iii) is a big deal, it’s how international rules become law!
RI
Rima 11 months ago
Totally agree, (i) and (ii) make sense together!
SA
Salena 11 months ago
Wait, are you saying (i) is just voluntary? That seems off.
MI
Milly 12 months ago
I think (iii) is also true, laws can change with state adoption.
CA
Cassi 12 months ago
(ii) is correct, only binding for those who adopt them.
GA
Galen 12 months ago
I lean towards (D) because it seems like all three statements could be true in different contexts, but I'm not completely confident.
LA
Lazaro 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify binding agreements, and I feel like (ii) might be misleading.
TA
Tambra 1 year ago
I think (iii) is definitely correct because regulations can become law when states adopt them, but I'm a bit confused about (ii).
NI
Nieves 1 year ago
I remember discussing how international regulations can sometimes be voluntary, but I'm not sure if that applies to all cases.
WI
Willard 1 year ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on the specifics of how international regulations work. I'll need to review my notes before attempting this.
DE
Deandrea 1 year ago
(iii) seems like the key to this question. If international regulations can become legally binding, that's an important distinction.
LO
Lou 1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down step-by-step. I need to understand the nuances between the three statements.
GR
Graciela 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the difference between voluntary and binding international regulations. I'll need to think this through carefully.
TH
Thaddeus 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can handle it.
AM
Amie 1 year ago
Option (iii) is the way to go. You know, the whole idea of international regulations reminds me of that old saying, 'herding cats.' It's like trying to get a bunch of countries to agree on anything – good luck with that!
TR
Trinidad 1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I was going to go with (i) and (ii), but I suppose (iii) covers all the bases. Although, I have to say, the idea of international regulators as a bunch of bureaucrats in fancy suits trying to herd cats is kind of amusing.
BO
Bonita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trinidad
Haha, yeah, trying to herd cats sounds like a tough job.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trinidad
Haha, the image of bureaucrats herding cats is quite amusing!
AL
Alita 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trinidad
It's interesting to think about international regulators as bureaucrats in fancy suits.
GE
Gertude 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trinidad
I agree, international regulations can become law if adopted by individual states.
IL
Iluminada 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trinidad
I agree, international regulations can become law if adopted by individual states.
TA
Tawna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trinidad
I think (iii) covers all the bases.
ME
Meaghan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Trinidad
I think (iii) covers all the bases.
KE
Keith 2 years ago
I was leaning towards (i) and (ii), but you're right, (iii) is the most comprehensive answer. International bodies can set standards, but they only have teeth once governments make them law.
AS
Ashton 1 year ago
↳ replying to Keith
Agreed, (i) and (ii) are important steps, but (iii) is what gives international regulations real power.
LA
Latosha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Keith
It's important to remember that international regulations need to be adopted by individual states to have legal force.
ON
Oneida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Keith
Yes, (iii) shows the full picture of how international regulations become binding.
AL
Alison 1 year ago
↳ replying to Keith
I was also considering (i) and (ii), but (iii) does make sense.
LA
Lajuana 2 years ago
Option (iii) seems to be the clear winner here. International regulations only become legally binding once they are adopted by individual states. The other options are too limited in their scope.
SH
Sherill 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lajuana
Yes, international regulations need to be adopted by individual states to have legal force.
PA
Paris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lajuana
I agree, option (iii) is the most comprehensive.
GA
Gary 2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's important for international regulations to be binding on all members to ensure consistency in practices
HE
Helaine 2 years ago
I agree with Bernardo, because international regulations can become law if adopted by individual states
BE
Bernardo 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is D) (i), (ii) and (iii)
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel