Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 11 Question 58 Discussion

Which THREE of the following are disadvantages of rules-based approaches to ethical standards?Rules-based approaches:
C) are subject to precise definitions of wording and hence become contentious
A) are inflexible and expensive
B) motivate compliance through value and judgment
D) have subjective standards which may cause confusion.
E) require objective enforcement by an independent party.
F) are inconsistently applied due to the need for judgment.

CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Exam - Topic 11 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 11
[All CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions]

Which THREE of the following are disadvantages of rules-based approaches to ethical standards?

Rules-based approaches:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Rhea at Sep 22, 2022, 03:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Fletcher
10 months ago
E seems more like a requirement than a disadvantage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
10 months ago
I think B is a disadvantage too, but some might disagree.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
10 months ago
Wait, are rules-based approaches really that inflexible?
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
11 months ago
Totally agree with A and F!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsay
11 months ago
A and C are definitely disadvantages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
11 months ago
I’m pretty sure that rules-based approaches are often inconsistently applied, so option F might be one of the correct answers here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
11 months ago
I feel like we talked about how rules-based approaches can lead to confusion, so maybe option D is a disadvantage too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
I think option C about precise definitions causing contention sounds familiar from our practice questions, but I’m a bit uncertain about the wording.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
I remember discussing how rules-based approaches can be inflexible and expensive, but I'm not sure if that's one of the disadvantages listed here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the requirements - limited connectivity and minimizing costs. Azure Container Instances might be a good option since it's serverless and could scale to meet the needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about SAS account suffixes. I'm pretty confident I know the answer, but I'll double-check my notes just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the interface management profile and the zone protection profile. I'll need to review those concepts again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kandis
1 year ago
I'm just wondering, do the rules come with a complimentary straightjacket? Because that's what it sounds like to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
1 year ago
This question is making my head hurt. Trying to codify ethics into rigid rules? Good luck with that! I'll stick to my gut instinct, thank you very much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 year ago
I think E is also a downside. Who's going to be the 'objective' enforcer, and how do we know they're really impartial? Sounds like a recipe for more problems.
upvoted 0 times
Karan
1 year ago
E) require objective enforcement by an independent party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaquana
1 year ago
C) are subject to precise definitions of wording and hence become contentious
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
1 year ago
A) are inflexible and expensive
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hubert
1 year ago
I'm not sure I buy the 'expensive' part in A, but the other two are spot on. Rules-based ethics can become a bit of a legal minefield.
upvoted 0 times
Mayra
1 year ago
D) have subjective standards which may cause confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
C) are subject to precise definitions of wording and hence become contentious
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
1 year ago
A) are inflexible and expensive
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fausto
1 year ago
I agree with A, C, and F. The rigid nature of rules-based approaches can be a real problem, and the need for interpretation and judgment just opens the door to inconsistency.
upvoted 0 times
Hortencia
1 year ago
I agree with F as well. It's tough when rules aren't consistently applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 year ago
Yeah, C can be a real headache. The wording of rules can cause a lot of arguments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 year ago
I think A is a big issue too. It's hard to adapt when things are so inflexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terry
1 year ago
But rules-based approaches also provide clarity and consistency in ethical standards, which is important for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
1 year ago
A, C, and F seem like the biggest issues to me. Rules-based approaches can get bogged down in technicalities and end up being more about compliance than actual ethics.
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
1 year ago
Yes, I think the lack of flexibility and the potential for inconsistent application are major drawbacks. It can make it difficult to navigate ethical dilemmas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
1 year ago
I agree, A, C, and F can definitely be problematic. It's important to consider the practical implications of rules-based approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alona
1 year ago
I agree with Jeanice. Rules-based approaches can be inflexible, contentious, and inconsistently applied.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 year ago
I think A, C, and F are disadvantages of rules-based approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel