Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA17-BA3-1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion

The owner of a business takes goods from inventory for his own personal useWhich of the following accounting concepts would be relevant to this transaction?
D) Separate entity
A) Prudence
B) Going concern
C) Accruals

CIMAPRA17-BA3-1 Exam - Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA3-1 exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 2
[All CIMAPRA17-BA3-1 Questions]

The owner of a business takes goods from inventory for his own personal use

Which of the following accounting concepts would be relevant to this transaction?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Rana at Jul 05, 2025, 11:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA3-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Junita
9 months ago
I think Accruals might apply too, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
9 months ago
I agree, that’s a clear violation of it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
9 months ago
Wait, can’t he just take what he needs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
9 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
10 months ago
Definitely the Separate entity concept!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
10 months ago
I feel like going concern might not apply here, but I can't quite recall why. It seems more about the business's ability to continue operating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I believe the prudence concept could be important too, especially if it affects how we value inventory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about the accruals concept. It seems like it might apply if the goods were recorded as an expense when taken.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
10 months ago
I think the separate entity concept might be relevant here since the owner's personal use of goods could blur the lines between personal and business transactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is D, separate entity. The key here is that the business and the owner are distinct, so the owner can't just take inventory for personal use without it being properly accounted for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. I'm leaning towards the separate entity concept, since the business needs to be treated as its own distinct unit, separate from the owner's personal affairs. But I could also see an argument for accruals, if the business needs to account for the owner's personal use of inventory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions the owner taking goods from inventory, so I'm wondering if the concept of prudence might also be relevant, since the owner is potentially misusing business assets for personal gain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
11 months ago
I think this is a pretty straightforward question. The concept of separate entity would be relevant here, since the business owner is taking goods for personal use, which goes against the idea that the business is a separate entity from the owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say Prudence is the way to go. Gotta be careful with those personal withdrawals, don't want the books to look like a mess.
upvoted 0 times
Cherrie
1 year ago
D) Separate entity
upvoted 0 times
...
Christoper
1 year ago
A) Prudence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
1 year ago
I see your point, Tanja. Both D) Separate entity and A) Prudence could be relevant here to ensure accurate financial reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
1 year ago
But wouldn't A) Prudence also be relevant in this situation? It's about being cautious and not overstating assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jimmie
1 year ago
I agree with Raina. The owner taking goods for personal use should not affect the business entity's financial records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
1 year ago
Definitely going with D. Separate entity - can't be mixing personal and business like that, it's just bad accounting!
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
12 months ago
Definitely going with D. Separate entity - can't be mixing personal and business like that, it's just bad accounting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
12 months ago
D) Separate entity
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
12 months ago
C) Accruals
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
12 months ago
B) Going concern
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
1 year ago
A) Prudence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raina
1 year ago
I think the relevant accounting concept is D) Separate entity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 year ago
Separate entity, for sure! Can't have the boss raiding the cookie jar whenever he wants a snack.
upvoted 0 times
Izetta
1 year ago
D) Separate entity
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
1 year ago
C) Accruals
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
1 year ago
B) Going concern
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
1 year ago
A) Prudence
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamesha
1 year ago
Ooh, this one's tricky! Gotta make sure the business owner doesn't try to sneak in some free goods, right?
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
1 year ago
C) Accruals
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
1 year ago
D) Separate entity
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
1 year ago
A) Prudence
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel