New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA17-BA3-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA3-1 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA17-BA3-1 Questions]

Which of the following is an example of where the historic cost convention should be applied?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Hermila
3 months ago
Not sure about this... what if prices keep changing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
3 months ago
I agree, B is the clear choice here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
4 months ago
Wait, can we really ignore current prices? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
4 months ago
Definitely B! Costs should reflect what was paid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Essie
4 months ago
Historic cost applies to raw materials, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused, but I think research and development costs might not fit the historic cost convention since they can be quite subjective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to identify when to use historical costs, and I feel like it might be option D because it involves changes in valuation methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about bad debts being more about estimates rather than historical costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
5 months ago
I think the historic cost convention applies to actual transactions, so maybe it's related to option B with the raw materials?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward strategic planning question. I'll start by thinking about the overall goals of the firm, which are usually addressed first in the planning process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know IPsec is related to VPNs, but I'm not sure which of these technologies specifically works with the stateful failover aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I know the plugin is for internationalization, but I'm not sure how the articles are actually linked together. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
5 months ago
Okay, let me see. Automatic scaling and pausing during inactive periods - that sounds like the serverless option to me, so I'm going to go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
9 months ago
I'm going with option B, because I'm historicLOLly inclined to stick to the original costs. Get it? 'Historicly'? Okay, I'll see myself out.
upvoted 0 times
Malinda
8 months ago
User 3: Agreed, the historic cost convention should be applied in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
8 months ago
User 2: Yeah, sticking to the original costs is important in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
9 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iola
10 months ago
Research and development? Come on, that's clearly a cost that should be expensed, not capitalized under the historic cost convention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Werner
10 months ago
Haha, the bad debt question is a classic trick! You can't use historic cost for that, it's all about estimating future losses.
upvoted 0 times
Celeste
9 months ago
User 3: Actually, I believe the correct answer is D) A change to the method used to value inventory and work in progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
9 months ago
User 2: No, that's not right. It should be C) Expenditure on research and development.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
9 months ago
User 1: I think the answer is B) Raw materials purchased for $2.50 per kg now costing $2.60 per kg.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timmy
10 months ago
Definitely option B. The historic cost convention requires us to use the original purchase price, not the current market value.
upvoted 0 times
Timmy
9 months ago
It's crucial to follow the guidelines of the historic cost convention to accurately reflect the financial position of the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
9 months ago
Using the original purchase price is important in maintaining consistency with the historic cost convention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
10 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct choice for applying the historic cost convention.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Magda
10 months ago
I think the historic cost convention should be applied to the raw materials purchased for $2.50 per kg. The cost hasn't changed, so we should stick to the original price.
upvoted 0 times
Allene
8 months ago
I see your point, but what about the change in the method used to value inventory and work in progress?
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
8 months ago
I think the research and development expenditure should be considered under the historic cost convention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
8 months ago
But what about the potential bad debt of 8,000? Shouldn't that also follow the historic cost convention?
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
8 months ago
I agree, sticking to the original price for raw materials makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
8 months ago
I think option C is not a suitable example, as expenditure on research and development is not typically subject to the historic cost convention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
9 months ago
I see your point, but I believe option B is the most straightforward example for applying the historic cost convention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
9 months ago
I think option A could also be a valid example, as it involves a potential bad debt that was recorded at its original cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
9 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct example for applying the historic cost convention.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rima
11 months ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it should be applied to option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
11 months ago
I think the historic cost convention should be applied to option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel