Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 51 Discussion

Posted by James on Apr 02, 2023 at 04:28 PM

The following is an extract from a budgetary control report for the latest period:

The budget variance for prime cost is:

Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA2-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
KA
Katlyn 12 months ago
I’m leaning towards C, but A is a close call!
MA
Marsha 12 months ago
I thought it was B at first, but A checks out.
TR
Tracey 1 year ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems a bit off to me.
LE
Leslie 1 year ago
Totally agree, A makes the most sense here!
MY
Myra 1 year ago
Looks like option A is the right answer, $3,260 adverse.
RI
Ricki 1 year ago
I think I remember that adverse variances indicate overspending, so I’m leaning towards option A, but I’m not completely confident.
KR
Kristeen 1 year ago
I feel like I should be able to figure this out, but I keep second-guessing whether it's $3,340 or $3,260.
LE
Lera 1 year ago
This question seems similar to one we did in class about prime costs. I think the adverse variance was around $3,260, but I can't recall the exact numbers.
ST
Stefania 1 year ago
I remember we practiced calculating budget variances, but I'm not sure if I got the adverse and favorable mixed up.
CA
Carma 1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to identify the unnecessary step in migrating a Node.js app to Alibaba Cloud Function Compute.
CA
Caren 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'll need to review the server specifications to determine the correct answer.
UL
Ula 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question about database utilities and I think DBS was mentioned as a key player, but I can't recall the specifics.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Enterprise Edition has some advanced features, but I'm not sure exactly what they are. I'll have to think this through carefully.
IS
Isadora 1 year ago
This MPLS VPN question looks pretty straightforward. I'm confident I can identify the two correct functions from the options provided.
WI
Winfred 1 year ago
Alright, let's see. The image shows a favorable variance of $3,260, so the adverse variance must be the opposite of that. Option D seems to be the right answer here.
GO
Goldie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Winfred
User 3: I agree with Aja, the image shows a favorable variance so the answer must be D).
AJ
Aja 1 year ago
↳ replying to Winfred
User 2: Are you sure? I'm not convinced.
DA
Dacia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Winfred
User 1: I think the answer is D) $3,260 favourable.
GR
Gregg 1 year ago
Haha, the 'prime cost' part made me think of a prime rib dinner. I better focus on the actual numbers in the report instead of my growling stomach!
LA
Laurene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gregg
User 3: I agree, we need to focus on the numbers in the report.
LO
Loise 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gregg
User 2: Let's not get distracted, the variance is $3,260 adverse.
BA
Barrett 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gregg
User 1: I know, 'prime cost' does sound delicious!
VA
Van 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The image shows a favorable variance, but the question is asking for the adverse variance. I'll have to double-check my work on this one.
SH
Sheron 1 year ago
↳ replying to Van
Marla: Oh, I see. I guess I need to double-check my work on this one.
MA
Marla 1 year ago
↳ replying to Van
User 2: Are you sure? The image shows a favorable variance, but the question is asking for the adverse variance.
GL
Glen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Van
User 1: I think the answer is D) $3,260 favourable.
SO
Sol 2 years ago
The question clearly states that the budget variance for prime cost is adverse, so I'm going with option B. $18,580 adverse variance seems like the correct answer here.
IS
Isabelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sol
I'm not sure, but option D doesn't seem to align with the information provided in the report.
DO
Dominga 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sol
I'm leaning towards option A, but I can see why option B could also be correct.
VI
Virgilio 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sol
I think option C might be a better fit, considering the numbers in the report.
AD
Adelina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sol
I agree with you, option B seems to be the most logical choice.
JO
Jolanda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sol
Option B seems to be the most logical choice based on the information provided in the question.
TH
Thurman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sol
I would also go with option B. It's always crucial to analyze budget variances carefully.
KR
Kristine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sol
Yes, I agree. It's important to pay attention to such variances in budget reports.
HO
Howard 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sol
I think option B is correct too. The adverse variance is quite significant.
AR
Arminda 2 years ago
But the actual cost is higher than the budgeted cost, so it should be adverse. I stick with my answer.
LE
Lenora 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) $3,260 favourable.
AR
Arminda 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) $3,260 adverse.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel