New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 Exam - Topic 1 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 Questions]

Which ONE of the following statements best describes the impact of a government minimum price established above free market price?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Devora at May 21, 2024, 01:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA1-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alfred
3 months ago
B is spot on, it really messes with farm incomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
3 months ago
Wait, how does a minimum price above market not affect incomes? Sounds off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
3 months ago
A is a classic case of unintended consequences!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
4 months ago
I disagree, D seems more accurate for long-term effects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
4 months ago
Definitely B, surplus is a real issue with minimum prices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
4 months ago
I feel like option D makes sense because it talks about increasing farm incomes, but I wonder if the quotas part is accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about how a minimum price could affect producer incomes. Wouldn't it just stabilize them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question like this where the surplus was mentioned, so I’m leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
5 months ago
I think a minimum price above the market price usually leads to a surplus, but I'm not entirely sure if it directly reduces farm incomes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. A minimum price above the free market equilibrium will create a surplus, as producers will supply more than consumers demand at the higher price. This is a classic example of the unintended consequences of government intervention in the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know minimum prices can distort the market, but I'm not sure if that leads to a shortage or a surplus. I'll have to review my notes on price floors and price ceilings before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. A minimum price above the free market price will lead to a surplus, as producers will supply more than consumers demand at that higher price. This will reduce farm incomes, so I'm going with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eulah
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the impact of a minimum price. Is it creating a shortage or a surplus? I'll have to think this through carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
5 months ago
I think this question is testing our understanding of how government price controls impact supply and demand. The key is to identify that a minimum price above the free market price will create a surplus, since producers will be incentivized to produce more than consumers are willing to buy at that higher price.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on auditor communication requirements. I'll review the options carefully and think through the relevant auditing standards to determine the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
5 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The best approach is to use ArchiMate to create a standardized set of models that can be applied across all the architecture projects. That way, you can ensure consistency and make it easy for the different stakeholders to review and validate that their needs are being met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
10 months ago
I'm going to go with option E: the government installs a giant price-enforcing robot to make sure everyone obeys the minimum price. What could possibly go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Karan
9 months ago
User 3: I'm not sure, but I think option D could also be a possibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
9 months ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe option B is more accurate in describing the outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
9 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the best description of the impact of a government minimum price.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
10 months ago
I'm going with option C. If the minimum price is set just right, it might not affect the market price or producer incomes at all. Though I'm not sure how realistic that is in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
10 months ago
Option D seems plausible. The higher farm incomes might be good in the short term, but eventually the government may have to step in with production quotas to manage the surplus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
10 months ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards option A. A government-imposed minimum price would disrupt the normal market forces and create incentives for people to try and get around the policy.
upvoted 0 times
Jamal
9 months ago
True, it's important to consider all the possible consequences before implementing a government-imposed minimum price. It can have a significant impact on the market.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
9 months ago
That's a good point, option B could also be a valid description of the impact of a government minimum price. It really depends on how the policy is implemented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
9 months ago
But wouldn't a surplus of unsold produce and reduced farm incomes also be a possible outcome if the minimum price is set too high?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
10 months ago
I think you're right, option A seems to be the most accurate. It would definitely lead to a shortage and encourage people to find ways to bypass the minimum price.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
11 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. A minimum price above the free market price will lead to a surplus of unsold produce and reduce farm incomes.
upvoted 0 times
Irma
9 months ago
Yeah, I think you're right. It would definitely have a negative impact on farm incomes if there is a surplus of unsold produce.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
10 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most accurate. It makes sense that a minimum price above the free market price would result in a surplus of unsold produce.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noel
11 months ago
But if the minimum price is set above the free market price, wouldn't that lead to a surplus?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
11 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel