I'm going to go with option E: the government installs a giant price-enforcing robot to make sure everyone obeys the minimum price. What could possibly go wrong?
I'm going with option C. If the minimum price is set just right, it might not affect the market price or producer incomes at all. Though I'm not sure how realistic that is in practice.
Option D seems plausible. The higher farm incomes might be good in the short term, but eventually the government may have to step in with production quotas to manage the surplus.
Hmm, I was leaning towards option A. A government-imposed minimum price would disrupt the normal market forces and create incentives for people to try and get around the policy.
I think you're right, option A seems to be the most accurate. It would definitely lead to a shortage and encourage people to find ways to bypass the minimum price.
I agree, option B seems to be the most accurate. It makes sense that a minimum price above the free market price would result in a surplus of unsold produce.
Alona
1 months agoSlyvia
2 days agoDick
1 months agoSue
1 months agoVan
1 months agoDesmond
3 days agoTuyet
21 days agoTalia
2 months agoIrma
14 days agoEliz
17 days agoNoel
2 months agoLaurel
2 months agoNoel
2 months ago