MENU
When running ifconfig command on an Appliance, there are interfaces shown in the list: ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync. What is the purpose of these interfaces?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 156-835 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
37 comments · newest first
LE
Leigha
11 months ago
I think they represent the physical Sync interface on the appliance.
JO
Joana
11 months ago
Wait, are they really not in use? That seems odd.
AV
Avery
11 months ago
I thought they were just backups for the Sync interface.
AU
Audry
11 months ago
Totally agree, that's what I've read too!
GL
Glennis
12 months ago
They're bond members of Sync Bond, right?
BU
Buddy
12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about physical interfaces, but I don't think ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync represent the physical Sync interface.
BE
Bettina
12 months ago
I feel like I read that these interfaces are actually not in use and that the Sync interface is the main one for synchronization.
DE
Desiree
1 year ago
I think these interfaces might be backup options for the Sync interface, but I could be mixing it up with another practice question we did.
EL
Elfriede
1 year ago
I remember studying about network interfaces, but I'm not entirely sure if ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync are bond members or something else.
LU
Ludivina
1 year ago
Based on the options, it seems like the most likely answer is that these interfaces are bond members (slaves) of the Sync Bond. That would make the most sense for an appliance setup.
JO
Joni
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. These interfaces are likely bond members (slaves) of the Sync Bond, which is used for synchronization purposes.
JE
Jerry
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the purpose of the ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync interfaces. I'm going to read through the options and see if I can figure out the best answer.
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
RI
Rima
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure if these interfaces are backup for the Sync interface or if they're not in use at all. I'll need to think about it some more.
YO
Yoko
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between the flow and the process builder options. I'll need to review the differences between those two approaches.
JO
Joanna
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The firewall dropping packets from WS1 could be a possibility, but I'd want to double-check the firewall rules first. The default gateway being inaccessible is also worth investigating.
MI
Mireya
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward question about generating a link to a content page. I think I can handle this one.
BA
Bambi
1 year ago
I think the key here is understanding how the broker.rack configuration affects the placement of partition replicas. Based on the options, it seems like the correct answer is C - replicas for a partition are spread across different racks.
CO
Corazon
1 year ago
Haha, these network interfaces sound like they belong on a spaceship, not an Appliance! I bet the developers had a lot of fun coming up with those names.
SH
Shenika
1 year ago
C) These interfaces are not in use. Security GW module use Sync interface for synchronization
HA
Hannah
1 year ago
B) These interfaces can be used as backup for Sync interface
NO
Norah
1 year ago
A) These interfaces are bond members (slaves) of Sync Bond
MI
Miles
1 year ago
The wording of option D is a bit confusing. I'm not sure if 'represent' means they are the actual physical interfaces or just a representation of them.
KA
Katie
1 year ago
D) These interfaces represent physical Sync interface at the front panel of appliance
PA
Pamella
1 year ago
C) These interfaces are not in use. Security GW module use Sync interface for synchronization
LO
Louvenia
1 year ago
B) These interfaces can be used as backup for Sync interface
LE
Lea
1 year ago
A) These interfaces are bond members (slaves) of Sync Bond
ME
Melina
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the purpose of these interfaces, but option C seems a bit suspicious. Why would they be listed if they are not in use?
FR
Frederica
2 years ago
Hmm, that's an interesting perspective. I wonder if they are actually not in use according to option C.
PO
Portia
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe these interfaces are used as backup for the Sync interface.
FR
Frederica
2 years ago
I think the purpose of eth1-Sync and eth2-Sync interfaces is to be bond members of Sync Bond.
BO
Bok
2 years ago
Hmm, that's an interesting perspective. I wonder if these interfaces are actually not in use according to option C.
BR
Brandee
2 years ago
Option A looks like the correct answer. The interfaces are likely bond members (slaves) used for the Sync interface.
NA
Nakisha
1 year ago
Yes, I agree. It makes sense that they are used as slaves for the Sync interface.
TO
Tom
1 year ago
I think option A is correct. Those interfaces are probably bond members for the Sync interface.
WE
Wendell
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe these interfaces are used as backup for the Sync interface.
BO
Bok
2 years ago
I think the purpose of eth1-Sync and eth2-Sync interfaces is to be bond members of Sync Bond.