Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CheckPoint 156-835 Exam - Topic 6 Question 35 Discussion

When running ifconfig command on an Appliance, there are interfaces shown in the list: ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync. What is the purpose of these interfaces?
A) These interfaces are bond members (slaves) of Sync Bond
B) These interfaces can be used as backup for Sync interface
C) These interfaces are not in use. Security GW module use Sync interface for synchronization
D) These interfaces represent physical Sync interface at the front panel of appliance

CheckPoint 156-835 Exam - Topic 6 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-835 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 6
[All 156-835 Questions]

When running ifconfig command on an Appliance, there are interfaces shown in the list: ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync. What is the purpose of these interfaces?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Nathalie at May 09, 2024, 07:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 156-835 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Leigha
6 months ago
I think they represent the physical Sync interface on the appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
6 months ago
Wait, are they really not in use? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
7 months ago
I thought they were just backups for the Sync interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
7 months ago
Totally agree, that's what I've read too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glennis
7 months ago
They're bond members of Sync Bond, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
7 months ago
I vaguely recall something about physical interfaces, but I don't think ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync represent the physical Sync interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
7 months ago
I feel like I read that these interfaces are actually not in use and that the Sync interface is the main one for synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desiree
8 months ago
I think these interfaces might be backup options for the Sync interface, but I could be mixing it up with another practice question we did.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
8 months ago
I remember studying about network interfaces, but I'm not entirely sure if ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync are bond members or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
8 months ago
Based on the options, it seems like the most likely answer is that these interfaces are bond members (slaves) of the Sync Bond. That would make the most sense for an appliance setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. These interfaces are likely bond members (slaves) of the Sync Bond, which is used for synchronization purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking about the purpose of the ethl-Sync and eth2-Sync interfaces. I'm going to read through the options and see if I can figure out the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. I'm not sure if these interfaces are backup for the Sync interface or if they're not in use at all. I'll need to think about it some more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between the flow and the process builder options. I'll need to review the differences between those two approaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. The firewall dropping packets from WS1 could be a possibility, but I'd want to double-check the firewall rules first. The default gateway being inaccessible is also worth investigating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
8 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about generating a link to a content page. I think I can handle this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
8 months ago
I think the key here is understanding how the broker.rack configuration affects the placement of partition replicas. Based on the options, it seems like the correct answer is C - replicas for a partition are spread across different racks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
1 year ago
Haha, these network interfaces sound like they belong on a spaceship, not an Appliance! I bet the developers had a lot of fun coming up with those names.
upvoted 0 times
Shenika
1 year ago
C) These interfaces are not in use. Security GW module use Sync interface for synchronization
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
1 year ago
B) These interfaces can be used as backup for Sync interface
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
A) These interfaces are bond members (slaves) of Sync Bond
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Miles
1 year ago
The wording of option D is a bit confusing. I'm not sure if 'represent' means they are the actual physical interfaces or just a representation of them.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
1 year ago
D) These interfaces represent physical Sync interface at the front panel of appliance
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
1 year ago
C) These interfaces are not in use. Security GW module use Sync interface for synchronization
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
1 year ago
B) These interfaces can be used as backup for Sync interface
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
1 year ago
A) These interfaces are bond members (slaves) of Sync Bond
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melina
1 year ago
I'm not sure about the purpose of these interfaces, but option C seems a bit suspicious. Why would they be listed if they are not in use?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 year ago
Hmm, that's an interesting perspective. I wonder if they are actually not in use according to option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe these interfaces are used as backup for the Sync interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
1 year ago
I think the purpose of eth1-Sync and eth2-Sync interfaces is to be bond members of Sync Bond.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 year ago
Hmm, that's an interesting perspective. I wonder if these interfaces are actually not in use according to option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
1 year ago
Option A looks like the correct answer. The interfaces are likely bond members (slaves) used for the Sync interface.
upvoted 0 times
Nakisha
1 year ago
Yes, I agree. It makes sense that they are used as slaves for the Sync interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tom
1 year ago
I think option A is correct. Those interfaces are probably bond members for the Sync interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wendell
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe these interfaces are used as backup for the Sync interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
1 year ago
I think the purpose of eth1-Sync and eth2-Sync interfaces is to be bond members of Sync Bond.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel