Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
CheckPoint Discussions
Exam 156-560 Topic 5 Question 53 Discussion
CheckPoint Exam 156-560 Topic 5 Question 53 Discussion
Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-560 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 5
[All 156-560 Questions]
What is an alternative method to double NAT in Azure?
A
Scaling
B
System Routes
C
Peering
D
User Defined Routes
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A
by
Kenny
at
Jan 13, 2025, 10:07 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium 156-560 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Cheryl
2 months ago
I'm just here for the double NAT jokes. Anyone else picturing a tangled network of NATting going on?
upvoted
0
times
...
Jill
2 months ago
Peering? Is that like when two clouds get really close and make it rain? I'm going with D) User Defined Routes, it sounds more technical.
upvoted
0
times
Reiko
1 months ago
Peering is a way to connect virtual networks without going through the internet.
upvoted
0
times
...
Sheridan
1 months ago
User Defined Routes can help control the flow of traffic between virtual networks.
upvoted
0
times
...
Noel
2 months ago
Peering allows for direct connections between virtual networks in Azure.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Gerri
2 months ago
B) System Routes? What is this, the 90s? I think I'll stick with the more modern solutions like C) Peering or D) User Defined Routes.
upvoted
0
times
...
Milly
2 months ago
A) Scaling? Really? I don't think that's going to help with the double NAT issue. I'd go with C) Peering or D) User Defined Routes.
upvoted
0
times
...
Zita
2 months ago
D) User Defined Routes sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if that's the best way to tackle double NAT in Azure. Hmm, decisions, decisions.
upvoted
0
times
Youlanda
25 days ago
B) System Routes could potentially solve the double NAT issue as well.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lorean
1 months ago
D) User Defined Routes could work, but it's important to weigh all the options.
upvoted
0
times
...
Reta
1 months ago
C) Peering might also be a viable option to consider.
upvoted
0
times
...
Bernardo
1 months ago
A) Scaling could be a good alternative method to double NAT in Azure.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Emelda
2 months ago
C) Peering seems like the way to go here. Double NAT can be a real pain, and peering looks like a solid alternative.
upvoted
0
times
Nana
30 days ago
User Defined Routes could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted
0
times
...
Truman
1 months ago
I agree, peering can help simplify the network architecture.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kallie
1 months ago
Peering is definitely a good alternative to double NAT.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Deeann
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) User Defined Routes could also be an alternative method.
upvoted
0
times
...
Albina
3 months ago
I agree with Katina, peering makes sense for double NAT in Azure.
upvoted
0
times
...
Katina
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) Peering.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Cheryl
2 months agoJill
2 months agoReiko
1 months agoSheridan
1 months agoNoel
2 months agoGerri
2 months agoMilly
2 months agoZita
2 months agoYoulanda
25 days agoLorean
1 months agoReta
1 months agoBernardo
1 months agoEmelda
2 months agoNana
30 days agoTruman
1 months agoKallie
1 months agoDeeann
3 months agoAlbina
3 months agoKatina
4 months ago