Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 5 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 5
[All ITS-110 Questions]

Requiring randomly generated tokens for each connection from an IoT device to the cloud can help mitigate which of the following types of attacks?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Marti at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lyndia
3 days ago
I think it's D) Session replay. Random tokens can prevent replay attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
8 days ago
Wait, are we really saying this can stop all those attacks? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
13 days ago
Yeah, session replay makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kassandra
19 days ago
Not so sure about that, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
24 days ago
I think it could also impact SSL certificate hijacking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
29 days ago
Definitely helps with session replay attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
1 month ago
A) Malformed URL injection? Nah, man, that's not what this is about. Randomly generated tokens are for session security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
1 month ago
B) Buffer overflow? Really? That's not even related to the question. Gotta pay attention, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgina
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the correct answer is "All of the above" because IoT security is a mess!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
2 months ago
D) Session replay is the right choice here. Randomly generated tokens can protect against that type of attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
C) SSL certificate hijacking is the correct answer. Requiring randomly generated tokens can help prevent session replay attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
3 months ago
I’m a bit confused. I thought malformed URL injection was more about input validation. Does token generation really help with that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
3 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I believe the answer is definitely session replay. Those tokens would invalidate old sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about session hijacking and how tokens can help. Could it also relate to SSL certificate hijacking?
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
3 months ago
I think using randomly generated tokens is mainly about preventing session replay attacks, right? It makes sense since each connection would have a unique token.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally confident on this. Could the random tokens also help prevent buffer overflows? I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonore
3 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The random tokens would make it much harder for an attacker to hijack an SSL certificate or inject malformed URLs. Session replay seems like the most likely answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know the random tokens are supposed to help, but I'm not sure which specific attack they're targeting. I'll have to review my notes on IoT security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
4 months ago
Okay, let's see. I'm pretty sure session replay is the right answer here, since the random tokens would prevent an attacker from reusing a previous session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
4 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the different types of attacks and how random tokens could help mitigate them.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel