Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus Exam ITS-110 Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 2
[All ITS-110 Questions]

Which of the following methods or technologies is most likely to be used to protect an IoT portal against protocol fuzzing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Arlean
7 days ago
PKI is great for authentication, but it's not specifically designed to defend against protocol fuzzing. I'd go with NGFW.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
8 days ago
HTTPS is a must-have, but it alone may not be enough to protect against sophisticated fuzzing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
12 days ago
HMAC is a good option too. It can help validate the integrity of messages and prevent unauthorized modifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
13 days ago
I think NGFW would be the best choice here. It can provide advanced protocol inspection and filtering to protect against fuzzing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
13 days ago
I disagree, I believe option C) Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) would provide better protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
16 days ago
I think option A) Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTPS) would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel