Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 2 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam

Question #: 56
Topic #: 2

[All ITS-110 Questions]

Which of the following methods or technologies is most likely to be used to protect an IoT portal against protocol fuzzing?

ASecure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTPS)

BPublic Key Infrastructure (PKI)

CNext-Generation Firewall (NGFW)

DHash-based Message Authentication Code (HMAC)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Paola at May 02, 2025, 05:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Quiana

10 months ago

Surprised nobody mentioned the importance of regular updates!

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

10 months ago

I’m leaning towards NGFW for better protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ngoc

10 months ago

PKI is definitely a strong choice too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Celestina

10 months ago

HMAC? Really? Not sure that’s the best option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maira

10 months ago

I think HTTPS is a must for securing IoT portals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleonore

11 months ago

PKI seems like it’s more about authentication rather than directly preventing fuzzing, but I could be wrong.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

11 months ago

HMAC sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it directly relates to protocol fuzzing or just message integrity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

11 months ago

I remember practicing with a question about NGFWs and how they can inspect traffic for anomalies, so that could be relevant here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elvis

11 months ago

I think HTTPS might be a good choice since it encrypts data, but I'm not entirely sure if it specifically protects against fuzzing attacks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlette

12 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this. HMAC seems like the most direct way to protect against protocol fuzzing by verifying the integrity of the messages being sent. I'll go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardine

12 months ago

Okay, let's see. NGFW could be a good option since it's designed to monitor and filter network traffic, which could help detect and block fuzzing attempts. I'll make sure to consider that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

12 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know HTTPS and PKI are important for secure communication, but I'm not sure how well they would hold up against fuzzing specifically.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ezekiel

1 year ago

This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the different methods and technologies mentioned and how they might protect against protocol fuzzing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

1 year ago

I think option D) Hash-based Message Authentication Code (HMAC) could also be a good choice to ensure data integrity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domonique

1 year ago

Fuzzing an IoT portal? That's like trying to break into a digital birdhouse. I'd just leave it alone and let the birds tweet in peace.

upvoted 0 times

Carrol

1 year ago

I agree, NGFW can help prevent unauthorized access to the IoT portal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carrol

1 year ago

NGFW would be the best option to protect against protocol fuzzing.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Alaine

1 year ago

But HTTPS encrypts the communication, making it harder for attackers to manipulate the protocol.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlean

1 year ago

PKI is great for authentication, but it's not specifically designed to defend against protocol fuzzing. I'd go with NGFW.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

1 year ago

HTTPS is a must-have, but it alone may not be enough to protect against sophisticated fuzzing attacks.

upvoted 0 times

Adelle

1 year ago

C) Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) is another important technology to consider for protecting against fuzzing attacks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

1 year ago

D) Hash-based Message Authentication Code (HMAC) can help protect against protocol fuzzing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

1 year ago

A) Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTPS) is important, but we also need additional security measures.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Titus

1 year ago

HMAC is a good option too. It can help validate the integrity of messages and prevent unauthorized modifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isadora

1 year ago

I think NGFW would be the best choice here. It can provide advanced protocol inspection and filtering to protect against fuzzing attacks.

upvoted 0 times

Willard

1 year ago

HMAC could also be useful for protecting against fuzzing attacks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yesenia

1 year ago

I agree, NGFW can provide advanced protocol inspection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

1 year ago

NGFW is a good choice for protecting against protocol fuzzing.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Vincent

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe option C) Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) would provide better protection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

1 year ago

I think option A) Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTPS) would be the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...