Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CertNexus Exam ITS-110 Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All ITS-110 Questions]

An IoT security administrator is concerned that someone could physically connect to his network and scan for vulnerable devices. Which of the following solutions should he install to prevent this kind of attack?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Alethea at Oct 22, 2024, 04:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Royce
21 days ago
NAC all the way! Can't go wrong with that. Although, I hear NIDS is great for catching hackers in the act. Maybe a combo platter would be tastier?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
1 months ago
HIDS might be a good option too, but NAC is probably the most comprehensive solution to address the administrator's specific concerns.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
3 days ago
HIDS might be a good option too, but NAC is probably the most comprehensive solution to address the administrator's specific concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
23 days ago
NAC can help restrict access to the network based on certain criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
26 days ago
I think NAC would be the best solution to prevent unauthorized physical connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
2 months ago
I'm torn between NAC and NIDS, but I think NAC would be more effective in this scenario to control who and what can connect to the network.
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
25 days ago
NIDS could also be useful in detecting any suspicious activity once someone is already connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
1 months ago
I agree, NAC would definitely help in controlling access to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
2 months ago
Network Access Control (NAC) seems like the best solution to prevent unauthorized physical access and device scanning on the network.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
4 days ago
User 4: NAC is more focused on controlling access to the network, while HIDS is more for detecting unauthorized activities within a specific host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
6 days ago
User 3: What about Host Intrusion Detection System (HIDS)? Would that be a good solution as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
20 days ago
User 2: Agreed, NAC would definitely help in preventing someone from scanning for vulnerable devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
22 days ago
User 1: I think we should install Network Access Control (NAC) to prevent unauthorized physical access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
I believe Host Intrusion Detection System (HIDS) could also be a good solution to detect any suspicious activity on individual devices within the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
2 months ago
I agree with Evette. NAC can help restrict access to the network based on user identity and device security posture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
2 months ago
I think the IoT security administrator should install Network Access Control (NAC) to prevent unauthorized physical connections.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel