Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All ITS-110 Questions]

An IoT security administrator is concerned that someone could physically connect to his network and scan for vulnerable devices. Which of the following solutions should he install to prevent this kind of attack?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Alethea at Oct 22, 2024, 04:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Maryann
5 months ago
NAC is the way to go, no doubt about it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
5 months ago
Wait, can someone really just plug in and scan? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
5 months ago
HIDS is cool, but not really for preventing physical access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
6 months ago
I think MAC filtering is enough for small networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
6 months ago
Definitely go with Network Access Control (NAC). It's the best for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
6 months ago
I feel like Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS) are more about detecting attacks rather than preventing unauthorized connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think Host Intrusion Detection Systems (HIDS) are more about monitoring than preventing physical access, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
6 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I remember something about MAC addresses being useful for filtering devices. Could that help?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
6 months ago
I think Network Access Control (NAC) might be the right choice here since it controls who can connect to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
6 months ago
This is a tricky one. I think the administrator is looking for a solution that can actively block unauthorized access, not just detect it. That makes me think NAC is the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
6 months ago
I'm a little confused on the differences between these options. Is MAC just controlling the physical layer access, or does it do more? I'm leaning towards NAC but want to make sure I understand the distinctions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to prevent physical access to the network, so the right answer has to be something that controls who can connect, not just detect intrusions. I'm going with NAC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'm debating between NAC and NIDS, since both could potentially help prevent unauthorized access and scanning. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I think the answer is Network Access Control (NAC) since that's designed to control and monitor access to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
11 months ago
NAC all the way! Can't go wrong with that. Although, I hear NIDS is great for catching hackers in the act. Maybe a combo platter would be tastier?
upvoted 0 times
Dorathy
10 months ago
Why not go for both NAC and NIDS for double the protection?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
10 months ago
I agree, NIDS can be really effective at detecting suspicious activity on the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
10 months ago
NAC is definitely a solid choice for preventing unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lawanda
1 year ago
HIDS might be a good option too, but NAC is probably the most comprehensive solution to address the administrator's specific concerns.
upvoted 0 times
Leota
11 months ago
HIDS might be a good option too, but NAC is probably the most comprehensive solution to address the administrator's specific concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
11 months ago
NAC can help restrict access to the network based on certain criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elden
12 months ago
I think NAC would be the best solution to prevent unauthorized physical connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
1 year ago
I'm torn between NAC and NIDS, but I think NAC would be more effective in this scenario to control who and what can connect to the network.
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
12 months ago
NIDS could also be useful in detecting any suspicious activity once someone is already connected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
12 months ago
I agree, NAC would definitely help in controlling access to the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arthur
1 year ago
Network Access Control (NAC) seems like the best solution to prevent unauthorized physical access and device scanning on the network.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
11 months ago
User 4: NAC is more focused on controlling access to the network, while HIDS is more for detecting unauthorized activities within a specific host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
11 months ago
User 3: What about Host Intrusion Detection System (HIDS)? Would that be a good solution as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
11 months ago
User 2: Agreed, NAC would definitely help in preventing someone from scanning for vulnerable devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
11 months ago
User 1: I think we should install Network Access Control (NAC) to prevent unauthorized physical access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dahlia
1 year ago
I believe Host Intrusion Detection System (HIDS) could also be a good solution to detect any suspicious activity on individual devices within the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 year ago
I agree with Evette. NAC can help restrict access to the network based on user identity and device security posture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
1 year ago
I think the IoT security administrator should install Network Access Control (NAC) to prevent unauthorized physical connections.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel