New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All ITS-110 Questions]

An IoT manufacturer discovers that hackers have injected malware into their devices' firmware updates. Which of the following methods could the manufacturer use to mitigate this risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cordelia at Nov 21, 2022, 05:58 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alverta
4 months ago
D sounds fancy, but is it really necessary for firmware updates?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
4 months ago
B is good for storage, but it doesn't stop malware from being injected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
4 months ago
Wait, can we really trust all certificates? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
5 months ago
I think C is just as important. Only trusted admins should handle updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
5 months ago
A is a must! Signed updates are crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
5 months ago
IPSec sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it directly prevents malware. I think it just secures the communication channel, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
5 months ago
I feel like we had a practice question about restricting firmware updates to trusted admins. That could help, but I'm not sure if it's enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think encrypting the updates is more about protecting data in transit rather than preventing malware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of signing firmware updates with a trusted certificate in class. That seems like a solid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. I'll start by identifying the true statements, and then double-check my reasoning to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
5 months ago
Ah, I see. If you do the cleansing before partitioning, then the training and test sets will both be affected, making it harder to assess the model's true performance. Doing it after partitioning keeps the test set clean and unaffected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
5 months ago
Alright, I think I've got it. The answer that's not a common impact is C - conflicts when also applying the Decoupled Contract pattern. Feels like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The question is asking about applying the technology, but the passage doesn't explicitly say we should use it everywhere. I might need to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel