Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All ITS-110 Questions]

An IoT manufacturer needs to ensure that firmware flaws can be addressed even after their devices have been deployed. Which of the following methods should the manufacturer use to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Coletta
5 months ago
B doesn't sound like it would help with firmware flaws at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
5 months ago
Wait, can devices really be updated after deployment?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
5 months ago
A seems risky, SSH access could be exploited.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
6 months ago
I think D is just as important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
6 months ago
C is definitely the way to go for OTA updates!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
6 months ago
I agree with C, but I also think having a writable configuration in flash memory could be useful for troubleshooting. It's a tough choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
6 months ago
I feel like option D is also important because signing firmware can prevent malicious updates, but it doesn't help with fixing flaws after deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about secure bootloaders. Option A seems relevant, but I feel like it doesn't directly address firmware flaws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
6 months ago
I think the best option here is C, the OTA firmware updates. We discussed how important it is to update devices remotely in our last study session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
6 months ago
I think the key here is remote access and updating capabilities. Option C about OTA firmware updates seems like the most comprehensive solution to address flaws after deployment. The other options are more limited in scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
6 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking about the best method, or just a method that would work? I want to make sure I understand the requirement clearly before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
6 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The answer is C - ensuring the device can accept Over-the-Air (OTA) firmware updates. That's the most flexible and secure way to push out updates to devices in the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options presented, but I'm not sure which one is the best approach to meet the requirement of addressing firmware flaws after deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about firmware updates for IoT devices. I think the key is to focus on methods that allow the manufacturer to remotely update the firmware after deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
7 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this. I'll start by eliminating the options that are clearly not IP rights, then focus on selecting the three that are. Methodologies and risk assessments don't seem to fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
7 months ago
Hmm, the image shows a button with the text "Cancel", so I'm guessing the selector needs to target that specific button. I'll have to double-check the syntax of the answer choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
7 months ago
I think a synonym map is the way to go here. That should let us define equivalent terms and make the search more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
1 year ago
I'd have to go with Option C as well. Having that over-the-air update capability is essential for an IoT product's long-term security.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
10 months ago
Agreed, OTA updates are a must-have for IoT devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
10 months ago
I think option C is the best choice for ensuring firmware flaws can be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
11 months ago
It's definitely important to be able to update the firmware remotely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
I agree, having OTA firmware updates is crucial for long-term security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
1 year ago
What, no option for just throwing the device in the microwave to update the firmware? Come on, that's a classic!
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
11 months ago
C) Ensure that device can accept Over-the-Air (OTA) firmware updates
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
12 months ago
A) Ensure that the bootloader can be accessed remotely using Secure Shell (SSH)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Venita
1 year ago
I agree, Option C is the way to go. OTA updates are the most practical solution for an IoT manufacturer to keep their devices secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 year ago
Option C seems like the best choice to me. Being able to remotely update the firmware is crucial for addressing security issues after deployment.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
11 months ago
D) Ensure that all firmware is signed using digital certificates prior to deployment
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
12 months ago
A) Ensure that the bootloader can be accessed remotely using Secure Shell (SSH)
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
12 months ago
C) Ensure that device can accept Over-the-Air (OTA) firmware updates
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daniel
1 year ago
I think ensuring that all firmware is signed using digital certificates prior to deployment is also important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
1 year ago
I agree with Felicia. OTA updates would allow for easy and secure firmware updates even after the devices are deployed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
1 year ago
I think the manufacturer should use Over-the-Air (OTA) firmware updates to address firmware flaws after deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel