New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 1
[All ITS-110 Questions]

An IoT developer discovers that clients frequently fall victim to phishing attacks. What should the developer do in order to ensure that customer accounts cannot be accessed even if the customer's password has been compromised?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Gladis at May 08, 2024, 08:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ITS-110 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Arleen
3 months ago
I thought LDAPS was just for directory services?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
3 months ago
Kerberos is cool, but not for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
4 months ago
Definitely go with 2FA! It's a game changer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
4 months ago
Really? Is 2FA even that effective?
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
4 months ago
2FA is a must these days!
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
4 months ago
I don't recall much about LDAPS, but I think it’s more about securing directory access rather than protecting accounts from phishing directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
5 months ago
I feel like 2FA is definitely the right answer, but I wonder if enabling Kerberos would also provide some level of protection?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think account lockout policies could help too. They might prevent repeated attempts after a password is compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
5 months ago
I remember studying about two-factor authentication in class. It seems like the best way to add an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
5 months ago
The key here is to prevent unauthorized access even if the password is stolen. 2FA is the obvious choice in my opinion, as it requires an additional step beyond just the password to authenticate. I feel confident that's the right approach for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options here. Kerberos authentication and LDAPS don't seem directly relevant to the phishing issue. I think I'll focus on the 2FA and account lockout policies as the most promising solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Implementing 2FA would definitely add an extra layer of security to prevent account access even if the password is compromised. That seems like the most logical solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know 2FA is a common security measure, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward security question. I'm pretty confident that the answer is two-factor authentication (2FA) to protect against phishing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettye
5 months ago
Alright, let's do this. I'll start by checking the current SELinux and firewall settings, then make the necessary changes to get the web server running on the non-standard port. Shouldn't be too difficult as long as I follow the steps carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
5 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about what information needs to be on a controlled substance prescription, so I'll focus on the key details like DEA numbers and license numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
5 months ago
I think the answer is B. The logic app needs to be triggered when the availability test detects a degradation, so a Request trigger seems like the appropriate choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
5 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'll just plug the numbers into the formula and see what the result is. Shouldn't be too hard.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
10 months ago
I bet the correct answer is 2FA. Unless the developer is living under a rock, that's the obvious choice.
upvoted 0 times
Keva
9 months ago
Absolutely, 2FA is a must-have feature to prevent unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
9 months ago
Yes, 2FA adds an extra layer of protection for customer accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
9 months ago
I agree, 2FA is definitely the way to go to enhance security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
9 months ago
D) Implement Secure Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAPS)
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
9 months ago
C) Implement account lockout policies
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
9 months ago
B) Enable Kerberos authentication
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
10 months ago
A) Implement two-factor authentication (2FA)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latonia
11 months ago
LDAPS? What is this, the 90s? 2FA is the only option that actually protects against phishing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
Lisandra
10 months ago
I agree, 2FA is essential in preventing unauthorized access to customer accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
10 months ago
2FA is definitely the way to go. It adds an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annalee
11 months ago
Account lockout? That's just asking for trouble. Customers will get locked out of their own accounts. 2FA is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
11 months ago
Kerberos? That's so old-school. 2FA is the industry standard for IoT security these days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
11 months ago
Two-factor authentication is definitely the way to go here. Passwords alone just won't cut it these days.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dudley
11 months ago
I think option C) Implement account lockout policies could also be helpful in preventing unauthorized access to customer accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
11 months ago
I agree with Annamae. Two-factor authentication is the best way to protect customer accounts even if passwords are compromised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
11 months ago
We should definitely go with option A) Implement two-factor authentication (2FA). It adds an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel