Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

A cloud developer for an IoT service is storing billing information. Which of the following should be considered a common vulnerability in regard to this data that could be used to compromise privacy?
A) Enabled notifications as required by law
B) Lack of data retention policies
C) Authorized access to personal information
D) Secured data in motion and at rest

CertNexus ITS-110 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's ITS-110 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All ITS-110 Questions]

A cloud developer for an IoT service is storing billing information. Which of the following should be considered a common vulnerability in regard to this data that could be used to compromise privacy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Buddy
7 months ago
D should always be a priority, but it’s not always implemented properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
7 months ago
Wait, are people really not securing data in motion? That’s wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
7 months ago
A is just a legal requirement, not a vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
7 months ago
I disagree, C is more concerning. Authorized access can still be misused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
7 months ago
Definitely B, no data retention policies can lead to huge risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelba
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards lack of data retention policies as a common vulnerability, but I could see how enabled notifications might also play a role in compliance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question about data security, and I feel like secured data in motion and at rest is more about protection than vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
8 months ago
I think authorized access to personal information could be a big risk, especially if the access controls aren't strict enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
8 months ago
I remember discussing how lack of data retention policies can lead to vulnerabilities, but I'm not sure if that's the best answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review my notes to refresh my memory on the proper NE status for a newly commissioned NR base station.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. The Latin square is more efficient in terms of data requirements, which is a key advantage over the more complex factorial design. I'll go with that unless I see something that makes me reconsider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. A living will is about end-of-life decisions, not an oral will. And it's a written document, not an alternative to a trust. I'm pretty sure the answer is D, neither I nor II.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 year ago
I can't believe they're even considering A as an option. Enabling notifications is a feature, not a vulnerability! The real issue is B - poor data retention policies.
upvoted 0 times
Irving
12 months ago
We need to make sure the data is secured in motion and at rest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
12 months ago
Yeah, lack of data retention policies is a real problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
1 year ago
I agree, enabling notifications is not a vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delbert
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the developers are 'resting' pretty comfortably while the data is 'in motion' all over the place. D is definitely not the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Mari
1 year ago
User 3: Securing data in motion and at rest is crucial for protecting billing information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Farrah
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that could definitely lead to privacy issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
User 1: Lack of data retention policies is a big vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nathan
1 year ago
C sounds like the right answer to me. Authorized access to personal info is a big vulnerability, even if the access is supposed to be legitimate.
upvoted 0 times
Salina
12 months ago
We should always be cautious about who has access to sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
Definitely, even if the access is supposed to be legitimate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
1 year ago
I agree, authorized access to personal info can be a big vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
1 year ago
C sounds like the right answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
1 year ago
We should always be cautious about who has access to sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
1 year ago
Even if the access is supposed to be legitimate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
1 year ago
I agree, authorized access to personal info is a big vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
1 year ago
C sounds like the right answer to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
1 year ago
But what about securing data in motion and at rest? Wouldn't that also be important to protect privacy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 year ago
I agree with Teri. Without proper data retention policies, sensitive billing information could be exposed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 year ago
Option A is a legal requirement, not a vulnerability. I think the correct answer is B - lack of data retention policies. That could lead to sensitive information being kept longer than necessary, increasing the risk of a breach.
upvoted 0 times
Lizbeth
1 year ago
B: Yeah, keeping sensitive information longer than necessary is definitely a risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
A: I think the correct answer is B - lack of data retention policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Teri
1 year ago
I think lack of data retention policies could be a vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
1 year ago
But what about securing data in motion and at rest? Wouldn't that also be important to protect privacy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 year ago
I agree with Elly. Without proper data retention policies, sensitive billing information could be exposed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
1 year ago
I think lack of data retention policies could be a vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel