Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CertNexus CFR-410 Exam - Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

According to company policy, all accounts with administrator privileges should have suffix _ja. While reviewing Windows workstation configurations, a security administrator discovers an account without the suffix in the administrator's group. Which of the following actions should the security administrator take?
A) Review the system log on the affected workstation. and B) Review the security log on a domain controller.
C) Review the system log on a domain controller.
D) Review the security log on the affected workstation.

CertNexus CFR-410 Exam - Topic 8 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for CertNexus's CFR-410 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 8
[All CFR-410 Questions]

According to company policy, all accounts with administrator privileges should have suffix _j

a. While reviewing Windows workstation configurations, a security administrator discovers an account without the suffix in the administrator's group. Which of the following actions should the security administrator take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Golda at Nov 21, 2023, 10:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CFR-410 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Timothy
8 months ago
I thought all admin accounts had to follow that naming convention!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
9 months ago
Wait, why would there be an account without the suffix? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
9 months ago
I agree with Teresita, the domain controller log is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
9 months ago
I think reviewing the system log on the affected workstation makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
9 months ago
Definitely should check the security log on the domain controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
9 months ago
I’m a bit confused; should we focus on the workstation or the domain controller? I feel like both logs could be relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the security log on the affected workstation could show unauthorized access attempts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like checking the system log on the affected workstation could help identify how the account was created.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
10 months ago
I think I remember that reviewing the security log on the domain controller might give more insight into account activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
10 months ago
I'm confident that the right answer is to review the security log on the affected workstation. The question is focused on that specific machine, so that's where I'd start my investigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erin
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure here. Should I be looking at the domain controller logs instead? The question mentions company policy, so the issue might be at the domain level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
10 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'd review the security log on the affected workstation to see if there are any suspicious activities or unauthorized access attempts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The policy is about administrator accounts, so I should probably check the security log on the domain controller to see if there are any issues with that specific account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
10 months ago
This question looks tricky, but I think I can break it down step-by-step to figure out the right answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the subnet range and how the Shazzam batch size factors in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
10 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about resetting a Session Border Controller to its factory default state. I'll carefully read through the options and select the one that best matches the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
1 year ago
This question is a real 'suffix-cation' of my security knowledge! I better choose wisely or I'll be in the 'admin-istrative' doghouse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
1 year ago
I'm going to review the security log on the domain controller. That's where I'll find the most relevant information about this policy violation.
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
1 year ago
I'll also check the system log on the domain controller just to be thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannine
1 year ago
Make sure to document everything you find for the report.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 year ago
That's where I'll find the most relevant information about this policy violation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
1 year ago
I'm going to review the security log on the domain controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janella
1 year ago
Wait, why would I review the system log on a domain controller? Shouldn't I be looking at the security log on the affected workstation to find out what's going on?
upvoted 0 times
Rickie
1 year ago
C: Review the system log on a domain controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
1 year ago
B: Review the security log on a domain controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
1 year ago
A: Review the system log on the affected workstation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hester
1 year ago
Hmm, the security log on the affected workstation might give me some clues about how this account ended up without the required suffix. I'll go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
Isabelle
1 year ago
It's important to review logs to understand what happened. I would choose option D as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 year ago
I think reviewing the system log on the affected workstation could also provide some insights. Option A might be worth considering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
1 year ago
I agree, checking the security log on the affected workstation is a good idea. Let's go with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roosevelt
1 year ago
This is a tricky one. I think I'd better review the security log on the domain controller to see if there are any unauthorized access attempts.
upvoted 0 times
Nan
1 year ago
D) Review the security log on the affected workstation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
1 year ago
C) Review the system log on a domain controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 year ago
B) Review the security log on a domain controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 year ago
A) Review the system log on the affected workstation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ryan
1 year ago
I believe reviewing the system log on the affected workstation could also provide valuable information about the account without the suffix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
1 year ago
I agree with Tasia. Checking the security log on the affected workstation would help identify any unauthorized activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
1 year ago
I think the security administrator should review the security log on the affected workstation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel