New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

C++ Institute CPA-21-02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPA-21-02 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-21-02 Questions]

Which code line inserted instead of the comment below will cause the program to produce the expected output?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Gaynell at May 23, 2024, 11:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPA-21-02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gertude
3 months ago
Wait, can you use two namespaces like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
4 months ago
D? Really? That doesn't seem right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
4 months ago
C seems too specific, not sure it will work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
4 months ago
Nah, I believe B is the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
4 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, but I have a nagging feeling that we might need something from the second namespace too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
5 months ago
I feel like using just one namespace could lead to conflicts, so maybe option C is the way to go?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to choose the right namespace, but I can't recall if we needed both or just one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
5 months ago
I think option A might be correct since it includes both namespaces, but I'm not entirely sure if that's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
5 months ago
This is a good opportunity to apply my understanding of namespaces. I'll carefully consider each option and try to eliminate the incorrect ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Namespace usage is something I've practiced a lot, so I should be able to work through this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to figure out which namespace contains the variables or functions needed to produce the expected output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different namespaces here. I'll need to review my notes on using namespaces properly in C++.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky namespace question. I'll need to carefully read through the code and think about how the different namespaces are being used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
5 months ago
Hmm, this seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure how the gotoPriorityExpression values affect the evaluation order. I'll need to re-read the question and the policy details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
5 months ago
Overlapping trust boundaries sounded familiar, but I can't quite remember how it applies to data threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
5 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I know synchronous and asynchronous have to do with how the API calls are handled, but I'm not confident I can identify the right characteristic. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
5 months ago
I think the key here is that the solution components are being assembled and constructed in direct response to a set of requirements. That points to "Design" as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
10 months ago
I wonder if the expected output involves a surprise dance party. If so, I'm going with option B --> A::print(); *dances awkwardly*
upvoted 0 times
Orville
9 months ago
User 3: I agree with Carolynn, option A) ob2.A::print(); seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
9 months ago
User 2: I'm not sure, but I believe option C) ob2.B::print(); might be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
9 months ago
User 1: I think option A) ob2.A::print(); is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Markus
11 months ago
This is a real head-scratcher. I'm just going to flip a coin and hope for the best. *flips coin* Aha, option D it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
11 months ago
Hold on, the question says to use the 'expected output', so I'm guessing we need to call the print() method of the derived class B. Option C for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
9 months ago
Let's go with option C then, it seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
9 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
10 months ago
But what about option A? Wouldn't that also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
10 months ago
I think you're right, option C seems to be the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carman
11 months ago
Wait, aren't we supposed to use the scope resolution operator to access the print() method of A? I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
11 months ago
But if you look at the image, it clearly shows that ob2 is an object of class A, so A) ob2.A::print() makes more sense
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
11 months ago
Hmm, looks like we need to call the print() method of the base class A, not B. I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Tandra
10 months ago
Yes, option A will call the print() method of the base class A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
10 months ago
I agree, option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kizzy
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) ob2.B::print()
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) ob2.A::print()
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel