Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

C++ Institute CPA-21-02 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for C++ Institute's CPA-21-02 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All CPA-21-02 Questions]

Which code line inserted instead of the comment below will cause the program to produce the expected output?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Gaynell at May 23, 2024, 11:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPA-21-02 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gertude
5 months ago
Wait, can you use two namespaces like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
5 months ago
D? Really? That doesn't seem right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
6 months ago
C seems too specific, not sure it will work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
6 months ago
Nah, I believe B is the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
6 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, but I have a nagging feeling that we might need something from the second namespace too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
7 months ago
I feel like using just one namespace could lead to conflicts, so maybe option C is the way to go?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
7 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to choose the right namespace, but I can't recall if we needed both or just one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
7 months ago
I think option A might be correct since it includes both namespaces, but I'm not entirely sure if that's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
7 months ago
This is a good opportunity to apply my understanding of namespaces. I'll carefully consider each option and try to eliminate the incorrect ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
7 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Namespace usage is something I've practiced a lot, so I should be able to work through this step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
7 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to figure out which namespace contains the variables or functions needed to produce the expected output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different namespaces here. I'll need to review my notes on using namespaces properly in C++.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
7 months ago
This looks like a tricky namespace question. I'll need to carefully read through the code and think about how the different namespaces are being used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
7 months ago
Hmm, this seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure how the gotoPriorityExpression values affect the evaluation order. I'll need to re-read the question and the policy details carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
7 months ago
Overlapping trust boundaries sounded familiar, but I can't quite remember how it applies to data threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
7 months ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. I know synchronous and asynchronous have to do with how the API calls are handled, but I'm not confident I can identify the right characteristic. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
7 months ago
I think the key here is that the solution components are being assembled and constructed in direct response to a set of requirements. That points to "Design" as the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
1 year ago
I wonder if the expected output involves a surprise dance party. If so, I'm going with option B --> A::print(); *dances awkwardly*
upvoted 0 times
Orville
11 months ago
User 3: I agree with Carolynn, option A) ob2.A::print(); seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
11 months ago
User 2: I'm not sure, but I believe option C) ob2.B::print(); might be the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
11 months ago
User 1: I think option A) ob2.A::print(); is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Markus
1 year ago
This is a real head-scratcher. I'm just going to flip a coin and hope for the best. *flips coin* Aha, option D it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Letha
1 year ago
Hold on, the question says to use the 'expected output', so I'm guessing we need to call the print() method of the derived class B. Option C for the win!
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
11 months ago
Let's go with option C then, it seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option C is the safest bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reynalda
1 year ago
But what about option A? Wouldn't that also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
1 year ago
I think you're right, option C seems to be the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carman
1 year ago
Wait, aren't we supposed to use the scope resolution operator to access the print() method of A? I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
But if you look at the image, it clearly shows that ob2 is an object of class A, so A) ob2.A::print() makes more sense
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
Hmm, looks like we need to call the print() method of the base class A, not B. I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Tandra
12 months ago
Yes, option A will call the print() method of the base class A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
1 year ago
I agree, option A is the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kizzy
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) ob2.B::print()
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A) ob2.A::print()
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel