Discuss Broadcom 250-586 Exam Topic 4 Question 26

What happens if a SEP Manager replication partner fails in a multi-site SEP Manager implementation?

AClients for that site connect to the remaining SEP Managers

BReplication continues and reporting is delayed

CReplication is stopped and managed devices discontinue protection

DClients for that site do not connect to remaining SEP Managers but date is retained locally

Suggested Answer: A

In a multi-site SEP Manager implementation, if one SEP Manager replication partner fails, the clients for that site automatically connect to the remaining SEP Managers. This setup provides redundancy, ensuring that client devices maintain protection and receive policy updates even if one manager becomes unavailable.

Redundancy in Multi-Site Setup: Multi-site SEP Manager deployments are designed with redundancy, allowing clients to failover to alternative SEP Managers within the environment if their primary replication partner fails.

Continuous Client Protection: With this failover, managed devices continue to be protected and can still receive updates and policies from other SEP Managers.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (delayed replication) and Option C (discontinued protection) are incorrect as replication stops only for the failed manager, and client protection continues through other managers.

Option D suggests data retention locally without failover, which is not the standard approach in a multi-site setup.

Therefore, the correct answer is that clients for the affected site connect to the remaining SEP Managers, ensuring ongoing protection.

Get Premium 250-586 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

20 comments · newest first

Vincent 1 month ago

B could happen, but I prefer A for client continuity.

Cortney 2 months ago

A makes sense. Redundancy is key in multi-site setups.

Benedict 2 months ago

I feel D is unlikely. Clients need to connect to stay protected.

Lanie 2 months ago

Option C worries me. Stopping replication is risky for protection.

Jina 2 months ago

I agree, but option B sounds plausible too. Reporting delay is manageable.

Tina 2 months ago

I think option A is the best. Clients should connect to other SEP Managers.

Stanford 2 months ago

Totally agree with A, that's how it should work!

Gregoria 3 months ago

D is interesting, but I don't think clients would just stop connecting.

Selma 3 months ago

C sounds too extreme, I doubt that happens.

Dorcas 3 months ago

I think B is more accurate, replication just gets delayed.

Azzie 3 months ago

A) Clients for that site connect to the remaining SEP Managers

Thaddeus 3 months ago

Totally agree with A, that's how it should work!

Anglea 3 months ago

D is definitely wrong, clients should connect to others.

Sharen 4 months ago

Wait, C means devices stop protecting? That sounds risky!

Barrett 5 months ago

I think B is more accurate, replication just gets delayed.

Beata 5 months ago

A) Clients for that site connect to the remaining SEP Managers

Mi 6 months ago

I'm leaning towards D, but I can't recall if clients actually retain data locally when a manager fails.

Brittani 6 months ago

I feel like if replication stops, it could lead to devices losing protection, which sounds like option C.

Christoper 6 months ago

I remember a practice question about replication delays, so maybe option B is correct?

Dominque 6 months ago

I think if a SEP Manager fails, clients might still connect to other managers, but I'm not entirely sure.

Broadcom 250-586 Exam - Topic 4 Question 26 Discussion