New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Broadcom 250-580 Exam - Topic 6 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Broadcom's 250-580 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 6
[All 250-580 Questions]

What version number is assigned to a duplicated policy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

When a policy is duplicated in Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), the duplicated policy is assigned a version number of 'One'. This means that the new policy starts fresh with a version number of 1, separate from the original policy's version history. The SEP system uses this new version number to track any subsequent changes to the duplicated policy independently of the original.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Josphine
3 days ago
I'm leaning towards B. Zero indicates it's a duplicate, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
8 days ago
I feel like it could be C. Adding one seems logical for tracking changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
13 days ago
I’m not sure about that, seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
18 days ago
Totally agree, it’s the original version number!
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
23 days ago
Wait, so it’s not just one? That’s surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
29 days ago
I thought it would be zero, but I guess not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
1 month ago
It's definitely the original policy's version number!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
1 month ago
Hmm, this question is a real policy nightmare. I'll take "Trick Questions" for 500, Alex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 month ago
B) Zero. Duplicates are like ghosts - they don't have a real identity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
2 months ago
D) One. Duplicates should always start fresh with version 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D, but I have a nagging feeling that it could also be the original's number plus one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the version number was reset to zero for duplicates. Could that be the case here too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
2 months ago
I think it's A. The original policy's version number makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
I remember something about versioning in policies, and I feel like it might be option C, but I can't recall the exact details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
3 months ago
C) The original policy's number plus one. That's the logical way to track changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
3 months ago
A) The original policy's version number. Why reinvent the wheel?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elise
3 months ago
I think the duplicated policy gets the original's version number, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
3 months ago
I'm confident the answer is C. The original policy's version number would be incremented by one for the duplicate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
4 months ago
I've seen this type of question before. The key is understanding that a duplicate policy gets a new version, so the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
4 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If it's a duplicate, then it should get a new version number, so I'll go with D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
4 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is the policy really duplicated, or is it a new version? I'm torn between B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
4 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'd go with C - the original policy's number plus one.
upvoted 0 times
Heidy
3 months ago
Zero sounds like a good option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel