MENU
What version number is assigned to a duplicated policy?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 250-580 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
When a policy is duplicated in Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), the duplicated policy is assigned a version number of 'One'. This means that the new policy starts fresh with a version number of 1, separate from the original policy's version history. The SEP system uses this new version number to track any subsequent changes to the duplicated policy independently of the original.
28 comments · newest first
AM
Amber
7 months ago
D is too simple. I believe A or C are more accurate.
JO
Josphine
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards B. Zero indicates it's a duplicate, right?
KA
Karl
8 months ago
I feel like it could be C. Adding one seems logical for tracking changes.
TE
Telma
8 months ago
I’m not sure about that, seems a bit off.
GR
Gracia
8 months ago
Totally agree, it’s the original version number!
VE
Verona
9 months ago
Wait, so it’s not just one? That’s surprising!
FA
Fatima
9 months ago
I thought it would be zero, but I guess not.
CA
Carline
9 months ago
It's definitely the original policy's version number!
GW
Gwen
9 months ago
Hmm, this question is a real policy nightmare. I'll take "Trick Questions" for 500, Alex.
MA
Mari
9 months ago
B) Zero. Duplicates are like ghosts - they don't have a real identity.
AR
Art
9 months ago
D) One. Duplicates should always start fresh with version 1.
MA
Marleen
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D, but I have a nagging feeling that it could also be the original's number plus one.
DA
Dalene
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the version number was reset to zero for duplicates. Could that be the case here too?
BR
Brandon
10 months ago
I think it's A. The original policy's version number makes sense.
ST
Stephaine
10 months ago
I remember something about versioning in policies, and I feel like it might be option C, but I can't recall the exact details.
TR
Tracey
10 months ago
C) The original policy's number plus one. That's the logical way to track changes.
DE
Detra
11 months ago
A) The original policy's version number. Why reinvent the wheel?
EL
Elise
11 months ago
I think the duplicated policy gets the original's version number, but I'm not completely sure.
CO
Cornell
11 months ago
I'm confident the answer is C. The original policy's version number would be incremented by one for the duplicate.
JU
Julie
11 months ago
I've seen this type of question before. The key is understanding that a duplicate policy gets a new version, so the answer is C.
MA
Marylyn
12 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. If it's a duplicate, then it should get a new version number, so I'll go with D.
ME
Merilyn
12 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is the policy really duplicated, or is it a new version? I'm torn between B and C.
TR
Trevor
12 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I'd go with C - the original policy's number plus one.
MA
Mabel
7 months ago
What if it’s actually D?
PE
Penney
7 months ago
I agree with C, it’s logical.
EV
Evette
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards A.
TR
Trinidad
7 months ago
I think C makes sense.
HE
Heidy
11 months ago
Zero sounds like a good option too.