Haha, leave it to Benton to come up with the simplest explanation. But you know, I'm not so sure. I feel like I need to go back and review the Schannel process again before I can confidently choose an answer.
You guys are really overthinking this, aren't you? It's clearly option A. The ProxySG establishes an Schannel when the client sends an NTLM type 2 message. That's the whole point of the Schannel, right?
Nah, I don't think that's right. If the client request fails IWA authentication, the ProxySG would need to establish an Schannel to handle the fallback authentication process. So, I'm leaning towards option C.
Wait, I'm not so sure about that. Didn't we learn that the ProxySG establishes an Schannel when a client request is first received? I think option B might be the correct answer here.
I agree, option D seems like the most likely answer. The ProxySG needs to establish an Schannel to handle the NTLM type 3 message, which contains the client's authentication credentials.
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I'm not entirely sure about the correct answer, but I think it might be option D. The ProxySG should establish an Schannel when the client sends an NTLM type 3 message, right?
Dahlia
11 months agoEzekiel
11 months agoRuth
11 months agoTennie
12 months agoEzekiel
12 months agoVallie
12 months agoTimothy
1 years agoShawnee
1 years agoYolando
1 years agoRegenia
1 years agoBenton
1 years agoStephania
1 years agoDeandrea
1 years agoRhea
1 years agoMerissa
1 years agoDelmy
1 years agoAdolph
1 years ago