New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Broadcom 250-447 Exam - Topic 7 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Broadcom's 250-447 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 7
[All 250-447 Questions]

A large organization wants to stagger the installation of software updates with computers in different organizational groups by installing the updates on different days.

How can an administrator accomplish this without continually creating separate software update policies that target the different organizational groups?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lynda at Aug 28, 2024, 01:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 250-447 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gennie
3 months ago
D could work too, but it might get messy with too many clones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
3 months ago
Wait, can you really automate disabling the update plug-in? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
3 months ago
Cloning policies seems like a lot of extra work, isn't there an easier way?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
I disagree, I think A is more efficient for managing downloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
4 months ago
Option C sounds like a solid plan for staggering updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question about patch management, and I think modifying the Windows Patch Remediation Settings might be a viable option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
4 months ago
I feel like the Site Management settings could help stagger updates, but I can't recall the specifics on how to set that up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
4 months ago
I think creating clones of the Default Software Update Plug-in Policy could work, but it seems like a lot of extra work to modify each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
5 months ago
I remember something about using automation policies, but I'm not entirely sure if disabling the Software Update Plug-in is the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
5 months ago
Option D looks interesting, but I'm not sure if modifying the Windows Patch Remediation Settings is the best way to handle this. I think I'll focus on the first couple of options and see if I can figure out a more straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by Option C. Disabling the Software Update Plug-in by group doesn't seem like it would actually stagger the updates. I'm not sure that's the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option A. If we can configure the Site Management settings to have each group download from a different package server, that seems like it could be a pretty elegant solution. I'll need to look into the details, but that's where I'm starting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. I think the key here is to find a way to target the different organizational groups without having to create a ton of separate policies. Option B sounds promising, but I'm not sure if that's the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different options and how they might work in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
5 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. Kubernetes definitely uses YAML files for its application definitions. I'm confident A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
10 months ago
I love how the question specifically says 'without continually creating separate policies'. Gotta hand it to the exam writers, they're really trying to trip us up here. B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Adaline
9 months ago
D) Create clones of the Windows Patch Remediation Settings and modify the target in each policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
9 months ago
I agree, B seems like the most efficient option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
9 months ago
B) Create clones of the Default Software Update Plug-in Policy and modify the target in each policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
9 months ago
A) Configure Site Management settings so that each organizational group downloads the software update installation files from a different package server
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgene
10 months ago
Option C sounds like the kind of 'creative' solution an engineer would come up with, but it's probably more trouble than it's worth. B is the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
Lashanda
8 months ago
B) Create clones of the Default Software Update Plug-in Policy and modify the target in each policy
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
9 months ago
A) Configure Site Management settings so that each organizational group downloads the software update installation files from a different package server
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
10 months ago
B) Create clones of the Default Software Update Plug-in Policy and modify the target in each policy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kirby
10 months ago
Haha, the 'continually creating separate software update policies' line makes me think of an admin just copy-pasting the same policy over and over. B is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
10 months ago
I agree, B is the best choice here. Disabling the plugin or managing separate patch policies sounds like a lot of unnecessary effort.
upvoted 0 times
Leonora
10 months ago
Yeah, creating clones of the Default Software Update Plug-in Policy seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Destiny
10 months ago
I think B is the best option too. It's more efficient than the other choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wilda
10 months ago
I see your points, but I think option D could also work. Modifying the target in each policy can help stagger the updates effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more efficient. It ensures each group downloads updates from a different server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
11 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward approach. Cloning the policy and modifying the target for each group is a neat way to stagger the updates.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
10 months ago
I agree, it's a smart way to manage software updates across different organizational groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
10 months ago
It definitely simplifies the process and ensures each group gets updated at different times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Titus
10 months ago
Cloning the policy and modifying the target for each group is a neat way to stagger the updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
10 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janna
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. It allows for customization without creating separate policies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel